Meet Sharon Gustafson, Trump's Pick for EEOC General Counsel
“Sharon fought for Peggy Young for years, facing obstacle after obstacle, when there seemed like little hope,” Sam Bagenstos said Tuesday. “Without her efforts, we would not have won the victory for pregnant workers that we won in that case.”
March 20, 2018 at 01:43 PM
5 minute read
Sharon Fast Gustafson, a solo practitioner in Virginia who's long represented employees and companies in labor and management fights, was picked Monday as general counsel to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
Gustafson is a former Jones Day lawyer who, since 1996, has run her own practice from Arlington, Virginia, where she specialized in discrimination, whistleblower cases and adoption, among other employer-related cases. She has appeared in administrative and federal court actions on behalf of workers and businesses. In 2014, she advocated for a pregnant worker in a U.S. Supreme Court case that created a new test for discrimination law.
The U.S. Justice Department filed a friend-of-the-court brief in support of claims brought by Gustafson's client, Peggy Young, who sued United Parcel Service Inc.
“The EEOC has consistently explained that employers are required to offer employment benefits on the same terms to pregnant employees and to nonpregnant employees with similar limitations,” DOJ lawyers, led by then-U.S. Solicitor General Donald Verrilli, wrote in the amicus brief.
The justices created a new balancing test to bring pregnancy discrimination cases: A pregnant employee must show her employer refused to provide accommodations and that the employer later provided accommodations to other employees with similar restrictions. The court sent the case back to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to determine whether UPS discriminated against Young when the company allegedly required her to lift 70 pounds in her role, even though she was pregnant.
The Metropolitan Washington Employment Lawyers Association in 2016 awarded Gustafson “lawyer of the year” for her civil rights work, including her advocacy in Young's case, according to the White House's nomination announcement.
Sam Bagenstos, a University of Michigan law professor, argued Young's case in December 2014 at the Supreme Court.
“Sharon fought for Peggy Young for years, facing obstacle after obstacle, when there seemed like little hope,” Bagenstos said Tuesday. “Without her efforts, we would not have won the victory for pregnant workers that we won in that case.”
Bagenstos said while she has fought for workers, as well as employers, her nomination was not surprising given her conservative leanings. Gustafson was not immediately reached for comment Tuesday.
Gustafson received her law degree from Georgetown University Law Center in 1991. After law school she worked for four years in the labor and employment law group at Jones Day in Washington.
Gustafson is married to David Gustafson, a U.S. Tax Court judge. Her son Adam is a partner at Washington's Boyden Gray & Associates. President Donald Trump recently dined at the Georgetown home of name partner C. Boyden Gray.
Trump's nominees to the EEOC, Janet Dhillon, a former Burlington Stores Inc. general counsel, and West Point professor Daniel Gade, have not yet been confirmed. It's unclear what direction the commission will take under a new Republican majority and general counsel.
Former EEOC general counsel P. David Lopez at Outten & Golden said Gustafson would have the benefit of a “talented and committed career staff.” He added: “That will definitely bolster her opportunities to successfully enforce civil rights laws.”
Under Lopez, the EEOC championed several causes, including an interpretation of civil rights law that extends to LGBT workers, and expanded systemic investigations. The EEOC also planned to collect pay data from companies with more than 100 employees to address the pay gap, an effort that was scuttled under the Trump administration.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBen & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
3 minute readBaltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
3 minute read5th Circuit Judge Jones Slams Proposal for Greater Amicus Brief Funding Disclosure
'Health Care Behemoth'?: DOJ Seeks Injunction Blocking $3.3B UnitedHealth Merger Proposal
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Why Kramer Levin Decided to Merge
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-61
- 3Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 4US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 5Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250