Trump's Newest Tweet Target: Solicitor General Noel Francisco
The president's early-morning tweet, seemingly prompted by a Fox News segment, didn't name Francisco but took aim at the SG's position in an Arizona case involving DACA recipients.
March 21, 2018 at 01:51 PM
4 minute read
The latest of President Donald Trump's Twitter salvos criticizing the Department of Justice was aimed today at a new, though unnamed target: Solicitor General Noel Francisco.
In an early-morning tweet, Trump took the Justice Department to task for failing to urge the U.S. Supreme Court to take up a case brought by Arizona defending its ban on the issuance of drivers' licenses to immigrants in the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA program.
A Justice Department spokeswoman said there would be no comment about the tweet.
In a 1998 essay on the role of the solicitor general that is posted on the Justice Department's website, former SG Seth Waxman wrote that “by long tradition the Solicitor General has been accorded a large degree of independence” in part because of his or her duty to the Supreme Court “to exercise restraint in invoking the Court's jurisdiction,” even though the SG is “of course an Executive Branch officer, reporting to the Attorney General, and ultimately to the President.”
The high court on Monday denied certiorari in Brewer v. Arizona Dream Act Coalition, in which a brief filed by Francisco on February 14 urged the court to hold or deny review of the case. The justices had asked the solicitor general to weigh in on the case last June.
The brief stated that the drivers' license case had been “overtaken by events” involving the controversial Obama administration DACA policy. “Arizona's opposition to DACA has largely been vindicated, and its concerns about the policy and its effects have been addressed,” the brief stated, referring to the Trump administration's decision to wind down DACA.
Francisco also pointed to another pending case testing the rescission of the policy, titled Department of Homeland Security, et al v. Regents of the University of California, et al, in which the government sought expedited review. On February 26, however, the Supreme Court denied the government's request without prejudice, stating that “It is assumed that the Court of Appeals will proceed expeditiously to decide this case.” The order tees up the prospect that the Supreme Court will decide on the fate of DACA next term.
Trump apparently was watching on Tuesday when Fox Business commentary Lou Dobbs railed against the government's brief, which he seemed to blame for the court's denial of review. “Are you kidding me?” Dobbs said. “What in the world is going on in our court system?”
Dobbs' guest for the segment was Harvard Law School professor Alan Dershowitz who told him, “stay tuned” for future action on the issue, suggesting that the SG and the court may have wanted to deal with the issue in other cases. Dershowitz also stated that “it is very, very hard to get review” from the court when the solicitor general urges against review.
Supreme Court scholar Josh Blackman mused on Twitter that “I never thought I would see a presidential tweet on a CVSG,” referring to the court's “Call for the Views of the Solicitor General” in the Arizona case. “What Trump does not realize, is that SG urged SCOTUS to deny review in AZ Dream Act case to leverage it to promptly review the DACA rescission case. This effort didn't pan out in hindsight, but it was a reasonable litigation strategy.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBankruptcy Judge Clears Path for Recovery in High-Profile Crypto Failure
3 minute readGovernment Attorneys Face Reassignment, Rescinded Job Offers in First Days of Trump Administration
4 minute readDC Judge Chutkan Allows Jenner's $8M Unpaid Legal Fees Lawsuit to Proceed Against Sierra Leone
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250