Foley & Lardner to Merge With Dallas-Based Gardere
Gardere Wynne Sewell and Foley & Lardner will combine on April 1, creating a 1,100-lawyer firm.
March 30, 2018 at 01:41 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Gardere Wynne Sewell and Foley & Lardner have agreed to merge, effective April 1, creating a firm of approximately 1,100 lawyers in 24 offices in the United States, Mexico, Asia and Europe.
The combined firm will be known as Foley Gardere in Austin, Dallas, Denver and Houston, and Foley Gardere Arena in Mexico City. All other offices will operate as Foley & Lardner. The joint firm's revenue will total $830 million, placing it among the Am Law 50, the firm said.
Gardere, based in Dallas, and Foley, founded in Milwaukee, have been talking for two years, and the merger is one of three involving large Texas firms this year. Houston-based Andrews Kurth Kenyon is merging on April 2 with Virginia firm Hunton & Williams, and Strasburger & Price, also based in Dallas, is in talks with Detroit firm Clark Hill.
With the April 1 merger, Foley secures a presence in the booming Texas market through Gardere's offices in Dallas, Houston and Austin, as well as offices in Denver and Mexico City, which is a gateway to Latin America. Gardere benefits from Foley's offices in the Midwest, the East and West coasts and Florida, as well as its offices in Belgium and Tokyo.
Jay Rothman
“In short, Foley and Gardere are better together,” Jay Rothman, Foley's chairman and chief executive officer, said in a statement.
Holland O'Neill, chair of Gardere who will be a Foley Gardere partner and member of the combined firm's management committee, said the synergies between the firms are clear.
Gardere will gain access to Foley's experience in the automotive, life sciences, sports and technology sectors and access to a large government affairs practice in Washington, D.C., the firms said. And it will give Foley geographic expansion in such practice areas as corporate, litigation, intellectual property, energy, government solutions and financial restructuring and reorganization.
Holland N. O'Neil
In particular, the merger will give Foley's energy practice enhanced capability in oil and gas, renewables, infrastructure and project finance. And Foley said it will also deepen its private equity, venture capital, and IP practices to better service its clients in Texas.
Kent Zimmermann, a consultant with Zeughauser Group who worked on the merger, said the U.S. legal market is consolidating and both firms will enjoy the benefits of scale. “They are going to have a larger profit pool to differentiate themselves from the market and attract and retain sought-after lawyers and clients,” he said.
This is not the first time Foley & Lardner has sought out a merger partner. In 2015, it considered a potential combination with the British firm Eversheds but broke off those discussions later that year. (Eversheds subsequently found a merger partner in Sutherland Asbill & Brennan.) And last year, Foley & Lardner and New York's Friedman Kaplan Seiler & Adelman talked about a potential tie-up.
For Gardere, the merger brings to an end the firm's 109-year reign as one of Texas' oldest standalone regional law firms.
Rothman said Foley has been looking at the Texas market for the last five-to-seven years, seeking specific practices, including oil and gas to complement the firm's renewables practice, and corporate and private equity, because of Texas's growing economy and the number of corporate headquarters in the state. Also, he said, the firm wanted to add to its IP, healthcare and trial practices. Gardere provides all of this, he said.
In addition, Rothman said the firms' cultures are compatible, which he considers an “absolutely critical” factor. “If you don't have a cultural fit among the lawyers, it's just not going to work,” he said.
The firm's Mexico City office was a bonus, he noted, providing a gateway to work in Latin America.
For Gardere, the combination provides a broader network of offices and the broader capability it needed, O'Neil said. Plus, Foley's people are great, she said.
“They have maintained their base culture. That really resonated with our lawyers, putting a bunch of rowdy Texans with others,” she said. “We have had a lot of fun together as people have gotten to know each other.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllChicago Midsize Firm Will Combine With Miami Boutique To Form Antitrust Powerhouse
3 minute readBack-To-Back Hurricanes' Impact on Florida Legal Work Will Go Beyond Usual Suspects
5 minute readHurricane Helene Likely To Roil Florida's Already Imperiled Insurance Market
5 minute readWhy These Two Partners Broke Away From An Established Fla. Player For Their Own Boutique
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Match Group's Katie Dugan & Herrick's Carol Goodman
- 2Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Eric Wall, Executive VP, Syllo
- 3Battle for Top Talent Accelerates Amid Profit and Demand Surge
- 4Friday Newspaper
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250