Waffle House Exec's Wife Defends Husband in Sex Tape Trial
The judge earlier in the day tossed out the conspiracy charge against the attorneys and their client.
April 03, 2018 at 02:17 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Daily Report
Waffle House chairman Joe Rogers Jr.'s wife testified Tuesday that their housekeeper's job performance began to deteriorate a year before she made a secret sex tape with her boss.
Fran Rogers said that, by April 2012, Mye Brindle was shorting her hours, spent much of her time on her computer and was shirking duties. Rogers said that whenever she discussed her job performance with Brindle, she would get better for a while, but it never lasted.
By 2012, Rogers said she began raising questions about Brindle's expense reports and that Brindle began asking for advances even as her job performance continued to slide. She soon discovered that Brindle was having financial difficulties.
But Brindle remained employed until she left her resignation in Joe Rogers' sock drawer in June 2012, Fran Rogers said. That was shortly after Brindle secretly videotaped a sexual encounter with Roger's husband.
That sex tape is the basis for criminal charges Fulton County District Attorney Paul Howard's office filed against Brindle and two attorneys she hired, Marietta attorney David Cohen and former Cobb County prosecutor John Butters. The trial opened Monday.
Assistant District Attorney Melissa Redmon told the jury that, as Brindle's relationship with Fran Rogers grew more contentious and her job appeared in jeopardy, Brindle and her lawyers “hatched a plan to catch Mr. Rogers in the act,” then use it as the basis for a future lawsuit.
Fulton County Superior Court Judge Henry Newkirk on Tuesday dismissed a felony eavesdropping conspiracy charge against Butters, Cohen and Brindle related to that sex tape. But Newkirk left in place two felony charges for a jury to decide. One accuses Cohen, Butters and Brindle of violating a state eavesdropping law banning video recordings in a private place. The second eavesdropping charge names only Brindle.
Newkirk made his ruling from the bench after the selection of a 12-person jury and two alternates Monday evening.
The ruling came after Atlanta defense attorney Brian Steel, who is defending Cohen, argued the entire indictment should be set aside.
Steel argued the indictment does not cite sufficient specific information to inform the defendants of exactly what charges they were facing or on what a county grand jury ultimately based its indictment.
Butters is represented by Marietta defense attorney Jimmy Berry and Bruce Morris of Atlanta's Finestone Morris & White. Brindle is represented by Marietta lawyer Reid Thompson.
Newkirk's decision to dismiss the conspiracy charge against the two attorneys and Brindle follows his decision in 2016 to dismiss the original indictment. Last November, the Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed Newkirk's decision to toss the extortion count but reinstated what were then three eavesdropping charges.
During Tuesday's openings, defense lawyers contended that Brindle is a victim whom Joe Rogers had required to stimulate him sexually as an unofficial, but expected part of her job.
“She made a decision that too many women have to make,” said Thompson, Brindle's attorney. “Do what the boss requires you to do. It was unwanted. … There was no love. No passion. No cuddling. No kissing. … It was just another chore for the maid to do.”
Brindle decided in 2012 to record one of those sexual encounters because “Joe Rogers is a very wealthy man, a very powerful man and very well connected,” Thompson said.
Steel contended in his opening statement that Brindle was a sex abuse victim and that Rogers had no expectation of privacy when he invited her into his bedroom to engage in an adulterous relationship. He said Cohen, as a lawyer, accurately concluded that Brindle had the right to record Rogers without his knowledge under those circumstances.
Cohen gave Brindle “proper legal advice” in good faith, Steel said.
“David Cohen did not deserve this,” he said. “He did nothing wrong. He gave the correct legal analysis with the fact pattern presented.”
Berry also emphasized that Rogers is “a rich and powerful man” whom Brindle so feared that she initially would not give the lawyers his name.
Berry said Brindle told Butters “I am afraid of him [Rogers]. Everybody knows him. I'm a nobody. Who's going to believe me?”
“John Butters believed her,” Berry said. “David Cohen believed her. They listened to her story. They believed what she told them. … For that they are sitting here … charged with a crime because they were doing what they thought was the right thing to do for their client.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllChicago Midsize Firm Will Combine With Miami Boutique To Form Antitrust Powerhouse
3 minute readBack-To-Back Hurricanes' Impact on Florida Legal Work Will Go Beyond Usual Suspects
5 minute readHurricane Helene Likely To Roil Florida's Already Imperiled Insurance Market
5 minute readWhy These Two Partners Broke Away From An Established Fla. Player For Their Own Boutique
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250