Fish & Richardson Offers 6-Figure Bonuses to Federal Circuit Clerks
The intellectual property-focused Am Law 100 firm has hiked its Federal Circuit bonuses by 30 percent.
April 06, 2018 at 03:07 PM
3 minute read
Fish & Richardson is offering six-figure bonuses for the first time to former judicial clerks from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
The leading patent litigation firm counts 28 former Federal Circuit clerks in its ranks, which Fish & Richardson claims is the most of any firm. The firm raised its bonus offerings to former Federal Circuit clerks by 30 percent this month.
“The Federal Circuit clerks come to us with a unique skill set that's not necessarily apparent in the market every day,” said Adam Shartzer, national recruiting principal for Federal Circuit clerks at Fish & Richardson and a member of the firm's diversity committee.
Shartzer, himself a former Federal Circuit clerk, noted that it's the only circuit-level court in the country with every judge—and therefore every clerk—under a single roof.
➤➤ Get IP news and commentary straight to your inbox with Skilled in the Art, an email briefing from Law.com. Learn more and sign up here.
Starting this month, Fish & Richardson is offering $115,000 bonuses to clerks with two years of experience at the Federal Circuit. Former clerks with 18 months' experience will rake in $105,000 bonuses and former clerks with one year of experience will earn $100,000 bonuses.
Fish & Richardson has roughly 400 lawyers. Data gleaned by ALM Intelligence shows that the firm brought in more than $416 million in gross revenue last year. Fish & Richardson has honed in on Federal Circuit clerks over the years as the firm recognized their value in the intellectual property field across its 11 offices, the bulk of which are in the U.S., save for an outpost in Munich that opened in 2007.
Shartzer said that unlike other courts' clerks, Federal Circuit clerks who enter private practice or become in-house counsel often continue to work together. Fish & Richardson has sought to corner the market on former Federal Circuit clerks, which the firm said has translated into it filing appearances in 11 percent of all cases before the Federal Circuit in 2017.
Fish & Richardson appeared in 44 more cases at the Federal Circuit, according to data collected by the firm, suggesting that other IP-focused outfits will have to swim upstream in order to compete with the Boston-based market leader, which late last year reached a truce in a trademark fight with another IP firm using the Fish name.
U.S. Supreme Court clerks, however, continue to command Big Law bonuses that dwarf clerks from other courts. Former Supreme Court clerks had hiring bonuses of $350,000 waiting for them in 2017 when they left the nation's highest court, which was nearly $100,000 larger than the justices' salaries, according to a December 2017 analysis by The National Law Journal.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSupreme Court Rebuffs GOP Request to Reject 'Thousands' of Pennsylvania Provisional Ballots
'Unfair Competition'?: Akerman Files Trademark Infringement Lawsuit Against Maryland Nonprofit
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Meet the Lawyers on Kamala Harris' Transition Team
- 5Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250