Law School Applications Are Up, Especially Among High LSAT Scorers
The percent of applicants with LSAT scores of 160 or higher is up more than 21 percent over last year, a welcome development for legal educators who have struggled to attract strong candidates in recent years.
April 06, 2018 at 10:59 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The rebound in law school applicants that the legal academy has long hoped for looks like it's finally arrived.
The number of people who have applied to law schools nationwide this application cycle has increased more than 8 percent over last year, according to new figures from the Law School Admission Council. Perhaps even more importantly, the number of applicants with high scores on the Law School Admission Test has surged.
The council reported this week that the number of applicants with LSAT scores of 160 or higher is up by 2,804, or 21 percent, over this time last year. (LSAT scores range from a high of 180 to a low of 120.) The very highest score band reported by the council, 175 to 180, saw the single largest increase, at 70 percent. However, those high scorers represent the smallest cohort of law applicants. Thus far, 682 people with those high scores have applied, up from 401 at this point last year. Conversely, the number of applicants with LSAT scores of 144 or below declined slightly.
“I know this is good news for all of us who had become concerned that some very talented students were choosing not to pursue legal education,” wrote council president Kellye Testy in a message to law school admissions personnel Thursday.
The applicant total is likely to tick up slightly before the current admission cycle closes. Testy noted that schools had received 85 percent of all applications by early April last year, meaning a few stragglers are still expected to apply for admission in the fall. (Application deadlines have passed for the elite law schools, while many lower-ranked schools continue to accept applications into the summer.)
The 2018 admission cycle is looking to be the first since 2010 to post a significant increase, which lends credence to the idea that the Trump administration and mounting political discord are prompting more people to consider pursuing law. Modest improvements in the entry-level legal job market—due largely to the recent decline in the number of newly minted lawyers—may also be playing a role in the resurging interest in law school.
In an interview Friday, Testy said she has observed a renewed sense of respect for the law in her recent conversations with perspective law students.
“What candidates have said to me is, 'For awhile, I thought going into tech was the way to go, but I don't want to spend my life making gadgets. I want to do good,'” she said.
The number of applicants nationwide has fallen each since 2011, with the exception of a small 1.5 percent uptick last year.
The increase in high scorers is a particularly welcome development, as legal educators have worried that the dearth of high scorers has led some schools to admit students whose low LSAT scores indicate they may struggle to graduate and pass the bar. For example, Erica Moeser, the former president of the National Conference of Bar Examiners, attributed declining bar pass rates in recent years to law schools admitting students with lower academic credentials.
Despite the apparent resurgence in applicants this year, legal education is still a long way from its admissions heyday. The current cycle is on track to see more than 59,000 applicants nationwide. That would be roughly on par with the size of the applicant pool in 2013, and far smaller than the 87,900 who applied in 2010.
Testy said she is cautiously optimistic that 2018 represents to the start of a long-term recovery in law school applicants, though she clarified that she does not expect applicant numbers to reach 2010's high-water mark.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSupreme Court Will Hear Religious Parents' Bid to Opt Out of LGBTQ-Themed School Books
Full 8th Circuit Hears First Amendment Challenge to School District’s ‘Equity Training’
4th Circuit Revives Racial Harassment Lawsuit Against North Carolina School District
3 minute read'A Horrible Reputation for Bad Verdicts': Plaintiffs Attorney Breaks Down $129M Wrongful-Death Verdict From Conservative Venue
Trending Stories
- 1Florida Judge Tosses Antitrust Case Over Yacht Broker Commissions
- 2Critical Mass With Law.com’s Amanda Bronstad: LA Judge Orders Edison to Preserve Wildfire Evidence, Is Kline & Specter Fight With Thomas Bosworth Finally Over?
- 3What Businesses Need to Know About Anticipated FTC Leadership Changes
- 4Federal Court Considers Blurry Lines Between Artist's Consultant and Business Manager
- 5US Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.