Law School Applications Are Up, Especially Among High LSAT Scorers
The percent of applicants with LSAT scores of 160 or higher is up more than 21 percent over last year, a welcome development for legal educators who have struggled to attract strong candidates in recent years.
April 06, 2018 at 10:59 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The rebound in law school applicants that the legal academy has long hoped for looks like it's finally arrived.
The number of people who have applied to law schools nationwide this application cycle has increased more than 8 percent over last year, according to new figures from the Law School Admission Council. Perhaps even more importantly, the number of applicants with high scores on the Law School Admission Test has surged.
The council reported this week that the number of applicants with LSAT scores of 160 or higher is up by 2,804, or 21 percent, over this time last year. (LSAT scores range from a high of 180 to a low of 120.) The very highest score band reported by the council, 175 to 180, saw the single largest increase, at 70 percent. However, those high scorers represent the smallest cohort of law applicants. Thus far, 682 people with those high scores have applied, up from 401 at this point last year. Conversely, the number of applicants with LSAT scores of 144 or below declined slightly.
“I know this is good news for all of us who had become concerned that some very talented students were choosing not to pursue legal education,” wrote council president Kellye Testy in a message to law school admissions personnel Thursday.
The applicant total is likely to tick up slightly before the current admission cycle closes. Testy noted that schools had received 85 percent of all applications by early April last year, meaning a few stragglers are still expected to apply for admission in the fall. (Application deadlines have passed for the elite law schools, while many lower-ranked schools continue to accept applications into the summer.)
The 2018 admission cycle is looking to be the first since 2010 to post a significant increase, which lends credence to the idea that the Trump administration and mounting political discord are prompting more people to consider pursuing law. Modest improvements in the entry-level legal job market—due largely to the recent decline in the number of newly minted lawyers—may also be playing a role in the resurging interest in law school.
In an interview Friday, Testy said she has observed a renewed sense of respect for the law in her recent conversations with perspective law students.
“What candidates have said to me is, 'For awhile, I thought going into tech was the way to go, but I don't want to spend my life making gadgets. I want to do good,'” she said.
The number of applicants nationwide has fallen each since 2011, with the exception of a small 1.5 percent uptick last year.
The increase in high scorers is a particularly welcome development, as legal educators have worried that the dearth of high scorers has led some schools to admit students whose low LSAT scores indicate they may struggle to graduate and pass the bar. For example, Erica Moeser, the former president of the National Conference of Bar Examiners, attributed declining bar pass rates in recent years to law schools admitting students with lower academic credentials.
Despite the apparent resurgence in applicants this year, legal education is still a long way from its admissions heyday. The current cycle is on track to see more than 59,000 applicants nationwide. That would be roughly on par with the size of the applicant pool in 2013, and far smaller than the 87,900 who applied in 2010.
Testy said she is cautiously optimistic that 2018 represents to the start of a long-term recovery in law school applicants, though she clarified that she does not expect applicant numbers to reach 2010's high-water mark.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readClass Action Lawsuit Targets 40 Private Colleges and Universities Over Alleged Price-Fixing
3 minute readUChicago Law Professors Release Desk Reference Breaking Down Crypto, Web 3 for Attorneys
4 minute readAs Student Workers Unionize in Droves, NLRB Tries to Prevent Colleges' Privacy Concerns From Slowing Momentum
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1PepsiCo's Legal Team Champions Diversity, Wellness, and Mentorship to Shape a Thriving Corporate Culture
- 2The Dynamic Duo Behind CMG's Legal Ops Team
- 3Land Use Issues Presented By Cold Storage Warehouses
- 4Zero-Dollar Verdict: Which of Florida's Largest Firms Lost?
- 5Appellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250