New Stradley Ronon Group to Help Advisors Navigate Fiduciary Rules
The group, staffed with ex-SEC officials, will help advisors and BDs comply with 'multiple and conflicting' fiduciary standards.
April 10, 2018 at 02:07 PM
2 minute read
The law firm Stradley Ronon has launched a Fiduciary Governance Group staffed with former Securities and Exchange Commission officials to help advisors and broker-dealers navigate the “multiple and conflicting” sets of fiduciary standards.
“Whether it's complying with the Department of Labor fiduciary rule, a new Securities and Exchange Commission fiduciary standard, or emerging state investment advice laws,” the new group will guide financial institutions on handling the compliance risk in a “holistic fashion and, where possible, create harmonized procedures that satisfy multiple applicable fiduciary rules and standards,” said Stradley Ronon attorneys George Michael Gerstein and Larry Stadulis, the group's co-chairs, in a Tuesday statement.
The 15-member governance team includes David Grim, the former director of the SEC's Division of Investment Management, as well as Sara Crovitz, formerly the IM division's deputy chief counsel and associate director, as well as attorneys specializing in federal and state securities, banking, insurance and ERISA/governmental plan law.
Both Grim and Crovitz joined Stradely Ronon's investment practice group in mid-March.
The attorneys will help advisor and BD clients determine:
- whether one becomes a fiduciary or assumes a similar role under common law and applicable regulatory regimes;
- how to comply with such fiduciary or similar duties under each set of laws and identify “daylight” between them; and
- ways to leverage existing compliance procedures under one regime to comply with other applicable regimes.
Gerstein told ThinkAdvisor that if the SEC takes up regulating advisor and broker titles in its fiduciary proposal, he sees “some states hitting the brakes on the legislative and regulatory front.”
If the SEC proposal “incorporates some aspects of the [DOL rule's] Impartial Conduct Standards (or something similar), I could also see a pullback from some of the states.”
Fiduciary commentary from the group will be available through client alerts and on the Fiduciary Governance Blog.
This article was originally published at ThinkAdvisor.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Issue of First Impression’: New York Judge Clears Coinbase Appeal Amid Crypto Regulatory Clash
4 minute readDC's Birchstone Moore Combines With Chicago-Founded Wealth Planning Firm
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Legal Tech's Predictions for Knowledge Management in 2025
- 2Fenwick Shutters Shanghai Office
- 3Litigators of the (Past) Week: Defending Against a $290M Claim and Scoring a $116M Win in Drug Patent Fight
- 4Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 5Am Law 50's Head Count 'Holding Pattern' Could Trickle Down
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250