DC Big Law Leaders Judge Zuckerberg; V&E Bulks Up Antitrust Bench
As the social media giant reaps the benefits from its success on Capitol Hill, other law firms are expanding inside the Beltway, while the D.C. Bar inaugurates its new home.
April 13, 2018 at 02:18 PM
6 minute read
Washington Wrap is a weekly look at the biggest legal industry news and Big Law moves shaping the legal business in Washington, D.C. Send tips and lateral moves to Ryan Lovelace at [email protected].
Mark Zuckerberg's trek to Capitol Hill this week won him plaudits from the technology sector and record gains on Wall Street. But Big Law leaders in Washington, D.C., think the jury is still out on the longer-term forecast for Facebook Inc. and its CEO.
As Senators grilled Zuckerberg, Facebook's stock experienced its largest one-day gain in nearly two years, according to Fortune. Facebook's stock rose 4.5 percent, or more than $21 billion in market value. And leading technology blogs scored the hourslong hearings as a victory for the social media billionaire and said, “Zuckerberg's boring testimony is a big win for Facebook.”
Stephen Immelt, Hogan Lovells' Washington-based CEO (and the brother of former General Electric Co. CEO Jeffrey Immelt), was traveling in Europe when Zuckerberg testified earlier this week. But Immelt, whose firm has done work for Facebook, said his impression was that a consensus was building that Zuckerberg was effective. Immelt said he did not think one day or one hearing would be enough to resolve the issues at play in the Zuckerberg hearings.
“Time will tell,” Immelt said. “I think this is going to be a fairly extended process.”
Zuckerberg did what he set out to do, indicated Barry Boss, co-chair of Cozen O'Connor's criminal defense and internal investigations practice.
“It was the Holy Trinity: He accepted responsibility for his mistakes, said he was sorry and promised to do better,” said Boss, the leader of Cozen O'Connor's D.C. office, in an email. “These are the fundamental requirements for anyone seeking forgiveness and a second chance.”
Whether the government regulates Facebook and ramps up scrutiny of Zuckerberg remains to be seen, but such decisions could turn on the outcome of the midterm elections this fall.
Law Firm Moves, News and Notes:
Vinson & Elkins grew its antitrust practice in Washington, D.C., by picking up new counsel Gregory Wells from Morgan, Lewis & Bockius.
Wells joins two other former Morgan Lewis antitrust partners, Darren Tucker and Hill Wellford, who joined Vinson & Elkins' office in the nation's capital earlier this year.
“V&E is the perfect fit for me and my clients,” Wells said in a statement. “I am especially pleased to be a part of the firm's highly regarded antitrust practice, which has a strong global platform and deep roster of impressive lawyers, including my friends Hill and Darren.”
Wells has several decades of experience representing clients on complex litigation and compliance matters in the technology, pharmaceutical and financial services sectors.
The D.C. Bar celebrated the grand opening of its new offices in Washington's Mount Vernon Triangle neighborhood on Thursday.
The 17,000 square foot venue features lots of patio and rooftop meeting space and a broadcast studio.
“Our goal was to create an all-in-one space for members and clients that addresses their needs as professionals while fostering community and we encourage members to come visit us,” said a statement from D.C. Bar CEO Robert Spagnoletti.
Among those who spoke alongside Spagnoletti at the ribbon-cutting ceremony were D.C. Court of Appeals chief judge Anna Blackburne-Rigsby and D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, who arrived late to the festivities.
Sanford Heisler Sharp, a frequent Big Law foe, opened a new office this week in Baltimore.
The plaintiffs firm first gained prominence from earning big settlements in discrimination class action cases, but it has more recently attracted attention for suing major law firms. Sanford Heisler recently settled a multimillion-dollar gender bias case on behalf of a female partner who worked at Chadbourne & Parke before the latter was absorbed by Norton Rose Fulbright. Another Sanford Heisler case against Proskauer Rose remains pending in a D.C. federal court.
Deborah Marcuse, who rejoined Sanford Heisler in February and will lead the Baltimore office, said its efforts to act on pay inequity in Big Law attracted her back to the firm.
Two prominent Big Law firms, Reed Smith and Squire Patton Boggs, grabbed headlines this week for how they approached controversies swirling around President Trump.
Eric Dubelier and Katherine Seikaly, two Reed Smith partners in Washington, D.C., will fight for one of the Russian companies accused by special counsel Robert Mueller III of interfering in the 2016 elections. Dubelier and Seikaly filed notices of appearance for Concord Management and Consulting, which a D.C. grand jury charged on eight counts in February 2018.
Squire, meanwhile, distanced itself from Trump lawyer Michael Cohen. Following an FBI raid of Cohen's offices, Squire said it ended its “strategic alliance” with Cohen. The firm also scrubbed any mention of Cohen from its website.
Trump's nominees to become the newest members of the federal judiciary are no strangers to calling “home” some large firms in D.C.
Trump nominated 20 more federal judges this week, including a pair who have local Big Law roots: Georgia Supreme Court Justice Britt Grant and Covington & Burling partner Emin Toro.
Grant, nominated to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, began her legal career at Kirkland & Ellis in Washington, D.C., Following a clerkship with D.C. Court of Appeals Judge Brett Kavanaugh, Grant worked on complex commercial litigation for Kirkland in D.C. at the outset of her career.
Toro, a judicial nominee for the U.S. Tax Court, handles tax controversies for multinational companies from Covington's D.C. office. He began his legal career as a law clerk to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.
Presidents have long canvassed major law firms for judicial nominees. Big Law has once again proven itself to be a lucrative farm system for Trump, who made filling judicial vacancies a priority early in his presidency.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWilkinson Stekloff Tops Big Law, Doles Out 150% Above-Market Bonuses
2 minute readTrump Win Ignites Global Legal Market: Lawyers Prepare for High Demand, Uncertainty
'Everybody Is Holding Their Breath': Big Law Lobbying Businesses See Mixed Earnings in Q3
3 minute readAre Lead Attorney Relationships More Important Now Than Law Firm Brands?
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250