Rod Rosenstein Set to Make Supreme Court Argument Debut This Month
That is, if he is still deputy attorney general. Rosenstein, who argued in federal appeals court as U.S. attorney for Maryland, has been the target of White House criticism in recent days regarding his oversight of Robert Mueller, the special counsel leading the Russia investigation.
April 13, 2018 at 02:21 PM
3 minute read
Rod Rosenstein, the embattled U.S. deputy attorney general, is planning to argue before the U.S. Supreme Court on April 23, representing the United States in a criminal sentencing case.
A Justice Department spokeswoman confirmed on Friday that Rosenstein will argue in Chavez-Mena v. United States, a test of how much justification judges have to offer when deciding not to reduce a sentence within the range of federal guidelines. The representation was first reported by CNN.
Rosenstein has been the target of White House criticism in recent days, and in the current unpredictable climate his status is uncertain. President Trump reportedly has considered whether to fire Rosenstein, whose authority includes oversight of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Russia investigation.
Rosenstein, according to NBC News, has said he is prepared to be fired.
Though the government is usually represented by lawyers in the U.S. solicitor general's office, it is not uncommon for other Justice Department officials to argue a case, sometimes near the end of their tenure.
Attorneys general Janet Reno, William Barr and Michael Mukasey each argued at least one case while in office. Sometimes the AGs have had to borrow morning coats—the usual garb for federal government lawyers arguing at the court—from lawyers in the solicitor general's office.
Both William Rehnquist and Antonin Scalia argued before the court they later joined while they were officials in the Justice Department.
It will be Rosenstein's first oral argument at the high court, but he has argued in lower courts before. In March 2016, while he was U.S. attorney in Maryland, Rosenstein argued before the en banc U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in a privacy case involving cell-site location information. The appeals court in May that year, ruling for the government, said federal authorities do not need a warrant to obtain location records.
Not long after he was confirmed as U.S. attorney, Rosenstein in March 2006 argued the en banc appeal in the Fourth Circuit case United States v. Moye, a firearms case. The appeals court upheld the convictions.
“I appear in court occasionally,” Rosenstein noted on his Senate questionnaire.
On May 1, Rosenstein is scheduled to make a Law Day public appearance at the Newseum in Washington, discussing issues ranging from “the rule of law, the First Amendment and the mission of the Department of Justice.”
Read more:
Ex-King & Spalding Partner Robert Hur Follows Rosenstein as Maryland US Attorney
DOJ's Rod Rosenstein: 'You Definitely Won't Hear This on Cable TV'
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All4th Circuit Upholds Virginia Law Restricting Online Court Records Access
3 minute read'Where Were the Lawyers?' Judge Blocks Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order
3 minute readRFK Jr. Will Keep Affiliations With Morgan & Morgan, Other Law Firms If Confirmed to DHHS
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibbons Reps Asylum Seekers in $6M Suit Over 2018 ‘Inhumane’ Immigration Policy
- 2DC Judge Chutkan Allows Jenner's $8M Unpaid Legal Fees Lawsuit to Proceed Against Sierra Leone
- 3Internal Whistleblowing Surged Globally in 2024, so Why Were US Numbers Flat?
- 4In Resolved Lawsuit, Jim Walden Alleged 'Retaliatory' Silencing by X of His Personal Social Media Account
- 5Government Attorneys Face Reassignment, Rescinded Job Offers in First Days of Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250