Stris & Maher, the LA Boutique, Claims 'Total Victory' in Settlement About Alleged Trump Affair
Peter Stris, who has argued seven U.S. Supreme Court cases, called ex-Playboy model Karen McDougal's settlement "probably the most rewarding result I ever got in my career."
April 19, 2018 at 01:36 PM
5 minute read
Peter Stris of the boutique Stris & Maher appeared on Rachel Maddow's MSNBC show Wednesday night.
Despite outside pressure to continue his lawsuit, Peter Stris of Stris & Maher on Wednesday night declared “total victory” in a settlement on behalf of former Playboy model Karen McDougal who allegedly had an affair with President Donald Trump.
Stris negotiated the settlement with American Media Inc., owner of the National Enquirer, which had paid McDougal $150,000 for the rights to her story about Trump shortly before the presidential election. AMI, in the contract, also had committed to feature her future fitness articles and photos in its magazine. A story about her relationship with Trump was never published.
“If this contract had been voided, she would have had to pay back the $150,000,” Stris told MSNBC's Rachel Maddow. “Here she got out of every obligation under the contract. She doesn't have to do articles. She doesn't have to take pictures. They gave her life rights back immediately—minus $75,000 if she happens to sell it, which she doesn't want to. And that's the maximum they get. They get 10 percent up to $75,000. That's basically the best we could have gotten had we litigated this to the end.”
McDougal was represented by entertainment lawyer Keith Davidson in the contract negotiations with AMI in August 2016. It was subsequently learned that Davidson had been in contact with Trump's personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, at the time.
AMI said in a statement Wednesday: “AMI is pleased that we reached an amicable resolution with Ms. McDougal today that provides both sides what they wanted as a result.”
Maddow asked Stris, whose boutique firm handles complex and U.S. Supreme Court litigation, if he had experienced political pressure from anyone to settle the case. “Just the opposite,” he said.
“What's made this so difficult is people want to see a fight; people want to see this used to essentially expose the things that are going on,” said Stris, referring indirectly to the recent legal actions surrounding Cohen. “When you're a lawyer and you represent a client—the reason people like Michael Cohen and Keith Davidson are creating all this mischief is because they're not faithfully representing people.”
When McDougal came to him, Stris recalled, she said she wanted out of the contract—no money, just the ability to tell her side of the story without fear of retribution. She was “unbelievably frightened,” Stris said, because AMI allegedly threatened to sue her for millions of dollars and to destroy her reputation if she spoke publicly. McDougal was able to do an interview with CNN's Anderson Cooper, he said, because Stris had filed his lawsuit against AMI.
Stris said he was fully prepared to take depositions to get documents and recordings. “Nothing would have made me personally happier, but that's not what Karen wanted. What Karen wanted was not to be beholden to this company,” he said.
McDougal turned to Stris for help on the recommendation of Theodore Boutrous of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher. Boutrous had made an offer on Twitter to provide pro bono legal assistance to anyone attacked by Trump for exercising his or her free speech rights. Stris contacted Boutrous and offered to join him. Stris told Maddow that his firm had donated “hundreds of thousands of dollars and time” to her case.
Just earlier in the day, Stris and a partner, Daniel Geyser, were at the U.S. Supreme Court for argument in Lagos v. United States. Geyser argued for Sergio Fernando Lagos in a dispute over federal victim restitution.
Stris, who has argued seven Supreme Court cases, called the McDougal settlement “probably the most rewarding result I ever got in my career.” McDougal, he said, was the victim of a “pattern of powerful men” trying to silence women.
“If people can't appreciate the fact that someone caught up in that has the right to have their voice and to have someone represent them to get out of it, then I really have no tolerance for them,” he said. “That's how the system should work.”
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPaul Weiss’ Shanmugam Joins 11th Circuit Fight Over False Claims Act’s Constitutionality
‘A Force of Nature’: Littler Mendelson Shareholder Michael Lotito Dies At 76
3 minute readUS Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
'Unlawful Release'?: Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Arnold & Porter Matches Market Year-End Bonus, Requires Billable Threshold for Special Bonuses
- 2Advising 'Capital-Intensive Spaces' Fuels Corporate Practice Growth For Haynes and Boone
- 3Big Law’s Year—as Told in Commentaries
- 4Pa. Hospital Agrees to $16M Settlement Following High Schooler's Improper Discharge
- 5Connecticut Movers: Year-End Promotions, Hires and an Office Opening
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250