It's a Hat Trick for Pro Bono at SCOTUS
This article is part of National Law Journal's 2018 Pro Bono Hot List recognition package that celebrates law firms that do well by doing good. See…
April 30, 2018 at 02:00 AM
3 minute read
This article is part of National Law Journal's 2018 Pro Bono Hot List recognition package that celebrates law firms that do well by doing good. See the other stories here.
It's one thing to take on pro bono work that makes it to the U.S. Supreme Court. It's another thing entirely to argue three of those cases in the span of four weeks—and score unanimous wins in all three.
Before the U.S. Supreme Court last term, Jenner & Block's Adam Unikowsky argued and won Kokesh v. Securities and Exchange Commission, Honeycutt v. U.S. and Howell v. Howell. The cases respectively dealt with complex controversies involving the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's ability to obtain disgorgement, federal conspiracy forfeiture and family law.
“The cases are a point of pride because they demonstrate the firm's deep commitment to pro bono litigation and its ability to achieve significant victories at the Supreme Court for individuals most in need of experienced counsel,” Unikowsky said in a statement.
The Chicago-based firm also participated in crucial voting rights and gerrymandering cases facing the high court, including representing the plaintiffs-appellees in Gill v. Whitford that Wisconsin's legislative redistricting maps were unconstitutional partisan gerrymanders. Jenner & Block partnered with the Campaign Legal Center in its work on that case, which the justices heard at oral arguments in October 2017 but had not yet resolved by early April.
Gerry Hebert, senior director of voting rights and redistricting at the Campaign Legal Center, said the Jenner team has proven to be great partners in the struggle for racial justice and equality.
“I've worked with dozens of firms, large and small. Jenner & Block is the best,” Hebert said in an email. “Their lawyers on voting rights and civil rights cases are incredibly dedicated to obtaining a just result. They work hard, provide wise and experienced counsel. Their lawyers share willingly in the hard work. They're willing to do the heavy lifting.”
Hebert said the Jenner lawyers share the credit for its success at the high court and noted that he learned from Jenner's team about how to best prepare to argue at the Supreme Court.
For Jenner & Block, the firm views its pro bono work as emblematic of the firm's core values.
“Pro bono and the work we do provides representation to those who otherwise would not be in a position to protect or defend or pursue their rights,” said Andrew Vail, co-chair of Jenner & Block's pro bono committee. “It also allows us to have an impact [on] law and policy in a way to improve and better our local communities and even more broadly nationally and, with our London office, globally.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPaladin Launches Pro Bono Election Protection Portal for Attorneys
'Graveyard Desecration'?: Md. Supreme Court Gives Descendants of Enslaved Persons Partial Victory in Property Row
5 minute readBlack Lives Matter DC Plaintiffs Suffer Legal Setback in Trump-Era 'Unlawful Attack' Complaint
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250