Securing the Future for Maryland's HBCUs
"I believe that the state will ultimately come to embrace a remedial order in this case, when they find themselves with HBCUs that are the envy of the nation in terms of academic programs and diversity." — Mike Jones
April 30, 2018 at 02:00 AM
3 minute read
This article is part of National Law Journal's 2018 Pro Bono Hot List recognition package that celebrates law firms that do well by doing good. See the other stories here.
For Kirkland & Ellis partner Mike Jones, when a federal judge last year ordered the state of Maryland to remedy its chronic failure to invest in its historically black colleges and universities, it was the culmination of nearly a decade of pro bono work and a personal victory.
Alums of Maryland's HBCUs filed the case in 2006, and Jones, an HBCU alum himself, joined in 2009. After a liability trial in 2013, U.S. District Judge Catherine Blake of the District of Maryland ruled for the plaintiffs, who alleged that by duplicating the HBCUs' academic programs at traditionally majority white schools, the state had maintained a vestige of racial segregation.
Following mediation, a six-week trial was held on if and how the state should remedy the violation. Then, last November, Blake again ruled for the plaintiffs, ordering the appointment of a special master to oversee the creation of new, unique academic programs for HBCUs. Now on appeal at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, the case is on hold for another round of mediation.
Jones said he believes what he told Blake in the courtroom: despite the state's opposition, Maryland will be better off if it properly invests in its HBCUs.
“I believe that the state will ultimately come to embrace a remedial order in this case, when they find themselves with HBCUs that are the envy of the nation in terms of academic programs and diversity,” he said.
Lead plaintiff David Burton said the next ruling will have long-term significance for all HBCUs, not just those in Maryland. Jones' HBCU alumnus status (he is a graduate of Dillard University in New Orleans) enhances his work on the matter, Burton said.
“On the one hand, [HBCUs] want to be the best and the brightest. On the other hand, they have to be accessible to those that don't have the opportunity to go to school,” Burton said. “Having someone like [Jones] coming from an HBCU, that really understands the duality of HBCUs' mission and the importance of that and this case, is priceless.”
Jones' work speaks to what Kirkland's director of pro bono, Julie LaEace, referred to as Kirkland's “entrepreneurial” pro bono approach. The firm doesn't require pro bono work, but its lawyers still seek out challenging cases that often have nationwide impact. That includes securing an injunction against President Donald Trump's transgender military ban last year and influential wins on behalf of prisoner's rights.
“Every attorney here understands that if you take on a pro bono case, you are handling that case like you would any other client matter,” LaEace said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPaladin Launches Pro Bono Election Protection Portal for Attorneys
'Graveyard Desecration'?: Md. Supreme Court Gives Descendants of Enslaved Persons Partial Victory in Property Row
5 minute readBlack Lives Matter DC Plaintiffs Suffer Legal Setback in Trump-Era 'Unlawful Attack' Complaint
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250