Challenging the Bail System in Texas
Some 9,000 misdemeanor arrestees were set free, while U.S. District Judge Lee Rosenthal's April 2017 injunction added further momentum to national money-bail reform efforts.
April 30, 2018 at 02:00 AM
3 minute read
This article is part of National Law Journal's 2018 Pro Bono Hot List recognition package that celebrates law firms that do well by doing good. See the other stories here.
Neal Manne never thought it would be easy. But when Susman Godfrey's managing partner signed on with two civil rights groups to challenge the bail system in Harris County, Texas, he was surprised by the county's response. He describes it as “all-out war.”
Two years and more than 1,000 pro bono hours later, the war is almost over. Some 9,000 misdemeanor arrestees were set free, while U.S. District Judge Lee Rosenthal of the Southern District of Texas' April 2017 injunction added further momentum to national money-bail reform efforts.
Her 193-page ruling followed an eight-day evidentiary hearing that featured 300 written exhibits, 2,300 video recordings of bail hearings, and 13 witnesses—including Harris County Sheriff Ed Gonzalez, who joined the plaintiffs in calling the system unconstitutional.
“The county's political allies thought [the matter] would grind down these small nonprofits,” Manne said. “My firm is not grind-downable.”
A few years ago Manne got to know Alec Karakatsanis of Civil Rights Corps. Karakatsanis had recently brought a successful challenge to detention practices in Birmingham, Alabama. They decided it was time to go big: Along with the Texas Fair Defense Project, they challenged the money bail system covering the nation's third-largest jail.
The complaint in O'Donnell v. Harris County alleged that, instead of getting individualized risk assessments, indigent misdemeanor arrestees were routinely jailed if they could not afford secured money bail. People charged with offenses like driving with an invalid license were forced to choose between pleading guilty and waiting up to two weeks behind bars for a formal bail review hearing.
Harris County argued that its pretrial process was among the fastest in the nation and that it was already reforming its bail system.
Through discovery Susman's team obtained thousands of video recordings of hearings where bail was first set. “People were laughed at by the judges or ridiculed or told they weren't allowed to speak,” Manne said.
But the key was statistical evidence presented by Susman partner Lexie White showing that hearing officers stuck to the prescheduled bail amount in 89 percent of misdemeanor cases. “Lexie White demolished the other side's case in the courtroom,” Manne said.
Rosenthal noted in her ruling that similar challenges had been brought around the country but most had settled. “This case is also one of the most thoroughly and skillfully presented by able counsel on all sides,” she added. The Fifth Circuit mostly affirmed in February.
Manne spent 400 hours on the case in 2017 alone, while White contributed 350 and associates Michael Gervais, Alejandra Salinas and Krisina Zuniga collectively added more than 500.
Susman is “pretty selective” about pro bono, Manne said. “When we do take something on, we're all in.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSupreme Court Appears to Lean Toward Letting TikTok Ban Take Effect
Trump Sentencing, TikTok Ban Welcome Justices Back to Work
‘Old Home Week’: Justice Breyer Hears Challenge to Cruise Ship Ordinance in 1st Circuit
J.D. Vance Campaign Finance Challenge Leads December Supreme Court Petition Roundup
Trending Stories
- 1Latham Lands Top Spot as US Firms Dominate in UK M&A Rankings
- 2Mich. Attorney Faces One-Year Suspension in Ill. for Lying to Firm, Clients
- 3Penn State Dickinson Law Dean Named President-Elect of Association of American Law Schools
- 4A Voyeur Videotaped Them Undressing. Should Cruise Ship Passengers Have to Arbitrate?
- 5Veteran Federal Trade Law Enforcer Joins King & Spalding in Washington
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.