Tested Vietnam Veterans Win Medical Care
"Quite frankly, for that office to stay with it all these years and keep fighting for us, I guess I can't say enough about them. They've been wonderful." — Bill Blazinksi
April 30, 2018 at 02:00 AM
3 minute read
This article is part of National Law Journal's 2018 Pro Bono Hot List recognition package that celebrates law firms that do well by doing good. See the other stories here.
Bill Blazinski entered Edgewood Arsenal in 1968—the middle of the Vietnam War.
During Blazinski's 60 days in the U.S. Army facility, he said he was locked in chambers filled with tear gas as his eyes watered and his skin burned. Twice, he said, he was given drugs without being informed of their long-lasting effects.
He and the thousands of other American soldiers tested at Edgewood were bound to silence, even as health complications, including cancer, began to emerge. They were left with no medical care, and no options.
Then came Gordon Erspamer. The Morrison & Foerster lawyer's own father had passed away due to the lingering effects of war-test radiation, and his father, too, was denied medical care. So in 2009, Erspamer filed a case on behalf of Vietnam vets against the CIA and other government entities, seeking medical care for those with conditions were linked to testing at Edgewood.
“Gordy was literally a legend in the veterans' community,” said Michael Blecker, a Vietnam veteran and the executive director of veterans group Swords to Plowshares, who co-filed the suit.
After Erspamer's passing in 2014, MoFo partner James Bennett took up the case, alongside Ben Patterson and Stacey Sprenkel who were already involved. Last year, after a nearly nine-yearlong court battle, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California ordered the Army to provide test victims medical care. Last month, the first veteran applied for care.
Earlier rulings in the case released test subjects from oaths of secrecy and ordered the Army to provide the veterans notice of potential health conditions linked to testing.
“Quite frankly, for that office to stay with it all these years and keep fighting for us, I guess I can't say enough about them. They've been wonderful,” said Blazinski, who plans to apply for medical care for his cancer. “I can't say enough for what they did, with the obstacles the government had thrown at them.”
Blazinski and Blecker noted the MoFo lawyers' dedication, empathy and transparency throughout the case. Bennett estimated that the firm spent more than 10,000 hours on the case.
In addition to the Edgewood, MoFo's J. Alexander Lawrence and Jayson Cohen worked with the American Civil Liberties Union and the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights to end an Arkansas court's practice of jailing individuals who couldn't afford the fines for bounced checks.
Plaintiff Charles Dade noted MoFo's professionalism, and said the case's success has allowed him to break a cycle that put him in jail every time he approached paying off a fine. Now, he's re-starting his business and moving forward.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Conversation with NLJ Lifetime Achievement Award Winner Jeh Johnson
'As I've Grown Older': John Morgan Looks Back at a Life in Law
Binance's Singapore-Based General Counsel Is Shattering Crypto's 'Bro Ceiling'
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250