Wilmer's Ron Machen Negotiated Panasonic's $280M Foreign-Bribery Penalties
The penalties come a year after Panasonic Avionics disclosed the California-based subsidiary was being investigated by two federal agencies for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
April 30, 2018 at 03:23 PM
4 minute read
Ronald Machen Jr., former U.S. attorney for D.C. and now a Wilmer Hale partner. Photo by Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
A team from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr represented a Panasonic Corp. subsidiary as the company worked to resolve alleged violations of federal anti-corruption law, a negotiation that resulted Monday in settlements with the U.S. Justice Department and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission totaling $280 million.
Wilmer partner Ronald Machen, a former U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, served as lead defense counsel for Panasonic Avionics Corp. a supplier of in-flight entertainment and communications systems, which agreed to pay a $137.4 million penalty as part of a deferred prosecution agreement with the Justice Department.
Partner Matthew Jones, also on Panasonic's team, was formerly chief counsel to Machen at the U.S. attorney's office. Machen and Jones were not immediately reached for comment Monday about the penalties under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
“We are pleased to have resolved these investigations; we have taken extensive steps over the past few years to strengthen Panasonic Avionics' compliance programs and internal controls, and we welcome an independent compliance monitor to assess our progress,” said Panasonic Avionics CEO Hideo Nakano. Panasonic Avionics is based in Lake Forest, California.
The Justice Department penalty announced Monday represented a 20 percent discount off the low end of the U.S. sentencing guideline range. Prosecutors said they gave Panasonic the reduction for its cooperation with the investigation and for the steps the company took to address the misconduct, such as replacing several senior executives who were involved in the misconduct.
The company separately agreed to pay $143 million in disgorgement to the SEC. According to the SEC settlement, the company created an “office of compliance and ethics” led by a new chief compliance officer.
The settlement terms also require Panasonic to retain an independent compliance monitor for at least two years and continue cooperating with the Justice Department.
The settlements come a year after the the company disclosed that Panasonic Avionics was being investigated by the two federal agencies for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
In court documents Monday, the Justice Department said Panasonic Avionics used a third-party service provider in China and other parts of Asia to hire consultants who never ultimately performed consulting work for the company.
One of the consultants was offered a position while he was working for a state-owned airline and negotiating two agreements with Panasonic valued at more than $700 million. In a six-year span, the consultant was paid nearly $900,000, and the portions of the contract he negotiated drove $92 million in profits for Panasonic, the Justice Department said.
Panasonic Avionics admitted that it mischaracterized the payments as “consultant payments,” which then caused its parent company to incorrectly identity them in its own books and records.
“Investors rightfully expect that the companies they invest in will not engage in bribery or fraud,” said Antonia Chion, associate director of the SEC's enforcement division. “Issuers must implement effective controls for the selection and engagement of consultants and agents to ensure compliance with anti-bribery statutes.”
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLuigi Mangione Charged in Federal Court for Stalking, Murder and Firearms Offenses
Luigi Mangione Indicted on Charges Including First-Degree Murder in Shooting of Health Insurance CEO
Suspected Shooter of UnitedHealthcare CEO Is Charged With Murder in New York. Now What?
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250