Lex Machina Reports Jump in Generic Drug Litigation
A surge in 2017 Hatch-Waxman filings runs counter to the overall downtrend in patent litigation.
May 03, 2018 at 06:33 PM
3 minute read
Hatch-Waxman litigation is back on the rise, particularly in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, according to Lex Machina's annual report on litigation involving generic drugs.
Suits filed in response to Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDA) were a pocket of strength in an otherwise declining patent litigation landscape. ANDA suits rose 29 percent to 417 in 2017, though that number remains below the 2015 peak of 475 suits, according to the report.
At the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), administrative challenges to patents listed in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Orange Book were down slightly, from 100 in 2016 to 96 last year.
More than half of the new district court cases were filed in Delaware, where suits rose 60 percent to 241. Branded pharmaceutical companies have been filing more often in Delaware, and a decision from Chief Judge Leonard Stark of the District of Delaware last September limited the venue objections that generics can raise based on the U.S. Supreme Court's TC Heartland decision.
New Jersey remained the second-most popular venue, where filings remained relatively flat at 111 cases. Activity fell in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia from 17 cases to two.
At the PTAB, Administrative Law Judges Tina Hulse, Lora Green and Christopher Paulraj handled the most Orange Book-related petitions.
Eli Lilly and Co., Pfizer Inc. and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. were the companies filing the most ANDA-related challenges in district court over the last two years, according to the Lex Machina data. Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell had the most district court representations during that period, followed by Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner and McCarter & English.
Teva Pharmaceutical, Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Apotex Inc. were the most frequent defendants in district court. The busiest defense firms were Phillips, Goldman, McLaughlin & Hall; Winston & Strawn; and Shaw Keller.
At the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati; Alston & Bird and Carlson, Caspers, Vandenburgh, Lindquist & Schuman were on the attack most often for generics. Fish & Richardson; Finnegan Henderson; and Williams & Connolly were the most active in defense of patent owners.
The most litigated drugs were Biogen's multiple sclerosis treatment Tecfidera, Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.'s heart medication Eliquis, and Amgen dialysis treatment Sensipar.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFTC Sues PepsiCo for Alleged Price Break to Big-Box Retailer, Incurs Holyoak's Wrath
5 minute readSupreme Court Will Hear Religious Parents' Bid to Opt Out of LGBTQ-Themed School Books
Wells Fargo and Bank of America Agree to Pay Combined $60 Million to Settle SEC Probe
Trending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250