Ninth Circuit Nominee Expresses Regret for Undergraduate Writings, but Insists He Didn't Hide Them
Ryan Bounds, the Oregon assistant U.S. attorney President Donald Trump nominated to the Ninth Circuit, expressed regret for the “overheated” and “overbroad” rhetoric he used in opinion pieces he wrote while in college, but said he hadn't intentionally withheld them from his home state senators' vetting committee.
May 09, 2018 at 01:16 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
Ryan Wesley Bounds testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee during his confirmation hearing to be U.S. circuit judge for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on May 9, 2018. (Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM)
During his confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Ryan Bounds, the Oregon assistant U.S. attorney President Donald Trump nominated to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, expressed regret for the “overheated” and “overbroad” rhetoric he used in opinion pieces he wrote while in college.
But at Wednesday morning's hearing, Bounds pushed back against the contention by Oregon's two Democratic U.S. senators—Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley—that he intentionally withheld his undergraduate writings from the bipartisan committee they formed to vet nominees.
In February, the Oregon senators' vetting committee ranked Bounds among the top four candidates for the Ninth Circuit seat left vacant when Judge Diarmuid O'Scannlain took senior status at the end of 2016. But around the same time, a liberal advocacy group surfaced opinion pieces Bounds wrote for a Stanford University newspaper where he criticized “race-focused” student groups and decried people who “fancy themselves oppressed.”
Wyden and Merkley have since withheld forms giving their sign off to Bounds' nomination—so-called “blue slips—and urged Senate Judiciary chair Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, to hold off his confirmation hearing. Grassley, however, said at Wednesday's hearing that he gave his Oregon colleagues ample opportunity to advise the White House on the nomination.
Bounds, for his part, clarified that he attached all his undergraduate writings to the questionnaire he returned to the Senate Judiciary Committee in January, and that they were available on the committee's website. When Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Connecticut, asked why the “controversial” writings weren't provided directly to the Oregon senators' vetting committee, Bounds said Wyden's staff only asked him for writings going back to his law school days.
“I followed the instructions that his staff gave me in writing,” Bounds said.
Bounds said that his college articles were “perhaps clumsy efforts” to fight what he saw as discriminatory attitudes and practices on campus. Under questioning from Sen. Christopher Coons, D-Delaware, Bounds said he recognizes there are people from long-marginalized communities who “continue to face obstacles and continue to face discrimination.” He, in particular, discussed an instance where an LGBTQ colleague told him about being physically assaulted.
“How did that affect you?” Coons asked.
“It was very upsetting,” said Bounds, after choking up and pausing a moment.
The exchange marked the third time Bounds paused during his testimony after becoming emotional. The other two times were when speaking about his grandfather and O'Scannlain, for whom he clerked.
“It would be the honor of a lifetime,” said Bounds of O'Scannlain, “to follow in his footsteps even though his shoes are impossible to fill.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSean Combs' Defense Counsel Seeks Hearing, Gag Over Alleged Leaks by Government
Wave of Office Closures Highlights the Weighty Stakes Surrounding Law Firm Growth
7 minute read'Effective Remedy'?: DOJ Unveils Corrective Action Plan in Google Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readAssistant Solicitor General Heads to Paul Hastings to Co-Chair Appellate Practice
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250