AT&T's Top In-House Lobbyist, Entangled in Michael Cohen Payment, Retires
AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson said Friday that hiring Trump lawyer Michael Cohen was a “big mistake.” Bob Quinn, vice president for external and legislative affairs and a former Mayer Brown lawyer, retired amid the scrutiny of the company's $600,000 payment.
May 11, 2018 at 11:03 AM
5 minute read
Bob Quinn, a former Mayer Brown trial attorney who has led AT&T Inc.'s lobbying team since 2016, has retired amid growing scrutiny over the $600,000 the telecom giant paid to Michael Cohen last year.
Quinn, executive vice president for external affairs and legislative affairs, ran the regulatory shop for state and federal operations and oversaw legislative efforts across the country. Previously, he led AT&T's work before the Federal Communications Commission as the company's senior vice president for regulatory affairs. In his first role at AT&T, as a vice president in the federal regulatory affairs group, he represented AT&T before not only the FCC but the U.S. Justice Department.
Quinn's retirement was announced in an internal memo AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson sent Friday, in which he described Cohen's hiring as a “big mistake.”
“In this instance, our Washington D.C. team's vetting process clearly failed, and I take responsibility for that,” Stephenson said in the memo. For the “foreseeable future,” he added, Quinn's external and legislative affairs team will report to AT&T general counsel David McAtee.
Quinn, according to a Reuters report Friday, was responsible for hiring Cohen, a Trump Organization lawyer and self-described “fixer” for Donald Trump.
AT&T said this week it paid Cohen $600,000 for “insights and understanding the new administration.” It specifically hired Cohen to “focus on specific long-term planning initiatives as well as the immediate issue of corporate tax reform and the acquisition of Time Warner,” according to an internal document reported by the Washington Post.
Cohen was not a registered lobbyist for AT&T, and neither was Quinn. “I don't qualify under the standards that are in place in Congress,” Quinn said last year in a C-SPAN segment about telecom regulations.
In the internal memo Friday morning, Stephenson said “everything we did was done according to the law and entirely legitimate.” He added: “But the fact is our past association with Cohen was a serious misjudgment.”
AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson testifies in 2016. Credit: Diego M. Radzinschi / NLJ
Quinn had written extensively on regulatory issues on AT&T's public policy website. In March 2017, Quinn wrote a post titled “delivering on the Trump regulatory reform agenda.” He touted the efforts by the FCC chairman, Ajit Pai, to reform “outdated” regulations.
“Over the past several years, United States telecom policy has been marked by the FCC placing its thumb on the public policy scales in order to pick winners and losers in the marketplace,” Quinn wrote.
Quinn was just one of AT&T's many ties to Mayer Brown. The firm has lobbied for AT&T since 2001, with its recent work focusing on broadband policy, along with privacy and arbitration legislation.
In the first three months of this year, Mayer Brown was the highest-paid firm in AT&T's lobbying stable, pulling in $110,000. Last year, Mayer Brown received $420,000 from AT&T, according to lobbying disclosures. Among AT&T's other lobbying firms are Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, Wiley Rein and Arnold & Porter.
Mayer Brown has also done battle for AT&T in court. Two Washington-based partners, Andy Pincus and Archer Parasharami, advocated for the company in AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, a case in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that class action waivers in arbitration agreements are enforceable. The firm successfully represented AT&T in 2013 in class action litigation in Illinois state court. In 2015, AT&T's legal department named Mayer Brown the inaugural winner of the “pro bono partner law firm of the year.”
In Washington federal trial court, O'Melveny & Myers partner Daniel Petrocelli has led the defense of AT&T's proposed acquisition of Time Warner against a Justice Department challenge. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon is weighing whether to block the deal. Leon is expected to announce his ruling in the coming weeks.
Stephenson's memo is posted in full below:
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readAmir Ali, MacArthur Justice Center Director, Confirmed to DC District Court
Health Care Giants Sue FTC, Allege Lina Khan Using Loaded Process to Vilify Pharmacy Benefit Managers
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'The Show Must Go On': Solo-GC-of-Year Kevin Colby Pulls Off Perpetual Juggling Act
- 2Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Match Group's Katie Dugan & Herrick's Carol Goodman
- 3Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Eric Wall, Executive VP, Syllo
- 4Battle for Top Talent Accelerates Amid Profit and Demand Surge
- 5Friday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250