Legal Hiring Data Finds Disadvantage for DC Law Grads
Of law schools within the District of Columbia, only Georgetown University Law Center beat the national average for graduates landing full-time, long-term employment jobs requiring bar passage or aided by a law degree.
May 11, 2018 at 03:32 PM
3 minute read
Photo Credit: Shutterstock
Law students graduating from schools inside the District of Columbia underperformed compared to the national average for landing full-time, long-term employment in a job requiring bar passage or aided by a law degree within 10 months of graduation, according to American Bar Association data.
Nationwide, 75.3 percent of 2017 graduates found such employment 10 months after graduation, according to law school employment statistics released by the ABA last month.
In Washington, only Georgetown University Law Center exceeded that threshold, with nearly 77 percent of its graduates finding full-time, long-term jobs requiring bar passage or aided by a law degree.
(George Mason University's Antonin Scalia Law School, located outside the District in northern Virginia, also performed better than the national average, with nearly 78 percent of its 2017 graduates' finding jobs that met the same criteria.)
Nearly 70 percent of the George Washington University Law School's 2017 graduates found such employment, as did a little more than 63 percent of Howard University School of Law graduates. For graduates of Catholic University of America Columbus School of Law and American University Washington College of Law the figures were about 55 percent and 53 percent, respectively.
“There's a definite need for students to be more creative” in order to secure good jobs, said Tonya Gaskins, director of career and professional development for Catholic University's law school.
Gaskins said the market is much more competitive than when she received her law degree from Catholic University in 2003, especially after the economic recession of the last decade put a crimp in the Big Law employment pipeline for freshly minted graduates.
At the same time, last year's federal government hiring freeze temporarily blocked a key early career path for recent Washington grads, likely directing some back to seeking law firm jobs.
More than 40 percent of Georgetown Law's graduates last year joined one of the nation's 100 largest firms in terms of head count, according to ALM data. Nearly 18 percent of GW Law grads found jobs at one of the 100 largest firms, according to the same data.
Meanwhile, cutthroat competition for jobs may be one factor in what American Bar Association president Hilarie Bass has described as an alarming trend of law students who are overwhelmed. Bass told attendees of the National Legal Malpractice Conference in Washington last month that she was concerned about data showing poor wellness among students, warning that the legal profession was about to “face a tsunami of really, highly competitive but really pressured young people about to enter the economy.”
Not that the outlook is completely gloomy.
With the hiring freeze in the federal government lifted, some of the burden on recent D.C. graduates could become lighter. GW Law's director of employment outreach, Katherine White, told The National Law Journal earlier this year that a growing number of students are pursuing careers at consulting firms, financial institutions and corporations that typically recruit graduates from business schools.
And, Gaskins noted, Washington is a hub for each of those kinds of jobs.
“No matter what you want to do, it's here,” she said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'New Circumstances': Winston & Strawn Seek Expedited Relief in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute read5th Circuit Rules Open-Source Code Is Not Property in Tornado Cash Appeal
5 minute readDOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
Trending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250