SEC Cutting Back on Corporate Enforcement Actions, Report Says
The enforcement decline is part of a downward trend that began in the last half of fiscal year 2017.
May 15, 2018 at 05:27 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
![](https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/390/2018/05/SEC-new-Article-201805151911-1-1.jpg)
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed only 15 new enforcement actions against public companies and their subsidiaries in the first half of fiscal year 2018—the lowest semiannual in five years, new figures show.
The trend was part of a report, “SEC Enforcement Activity: Public Companies and Subsidiaries—Midyear FY 2018 Update,” released Tuesday by the Pollack Center for Law & Business at New York University and by Cornerstone Research. The 15 enforcement actions compares with 45 in the same period a year ago.
The enforcement decline is part of a downward trend that began in the last half of fiscal year 2017 and has continued through the first half of 2018. [The SEC's fiscal half year began on Oct. 1 and ended on March 31.]
New York University School of Law professor Stephen Choi, director of the Pollack Center and co-author of the report, told Corporate Counsel that if the 2017 decline were due to lingering transition issues after President Donald Trump took office, “as time goes by we would begin to see an uptick. But that's not what we're seeing. This trend in lower enforcement is continuing.”
![](https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/390/2018/05/Stephen-Choi-Vert-201805152120.jpg)
The trend suggests that the SEC is not pursuing companies as aggressively as it had under prior administrations. “It could just be less fraud in the economy, but that isn't likely,” Choi said.
Choi said he also noticed that the range of industries that the SEC brought actions against has narrowed somewhat. The percentage of overall actions brought against companies in the category that includes finance, insurance and real estate rose to 67 percent—the highest percentage since Cornerstone began keeping track in 2010.
In contrast, the services industry had zero enforcement actions for the first time. “There are a lot of big companies in the services industry,” Choi said. “So it could be a temporary blip.”
He said enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act seems to escape the downward trend. FCPA enforcements had declined during the first eight months of the Trump administration, but have since jumped, he said.
He pointed to two FCPA enforcements in the first half of 2018, compared with none in the first half of 2017. “And in April, after the time period of this report, there [were] two more FCPA actions,” Choi said. “So it [enforcement decline] is not an overall phenomenon.”
The report also noted that monetary settlements in the first half of the year decreased substantially from prior fiscal years. The average monetary settlement so far in 2018 was $4.3 million, it said, significantly below the next-lowest semiannual average of $13.3 million, which occurred in the second half of 2015.
And the maximum monetary settlement of $14 million was by far the lowest maximum monetary settlement in any half-year in the database.
In other areas, the report showed:
- There were 12 individual defendants involved in the actions; nine of them held positions as CEO, CFO or controller.
- Actions concerning issuer reporting and disclosure, or investment adviser/investment companies were the most common types.
- More than half of public company and subsidiary defendants cooperated in this time period, compared to less than a third in the second half of 2017.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Will GOP-Led Senate, House Move to Repeal Biden's Late Regulations as Law Provides? Will GOP-Led Senate, House Move to Repeal Biden's Late Regulations as Law Provides?](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/nationallawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/398/2024/10/US-Capitol-Building-1-767x633-2.jpg)
Will GOP-Led Senate, House Move to Repeal Biden's Late Regulations as Law Provides?
![US Supreme Court Weighs Federal Agencies' Duty Under National Environmental Policy Act US Supreme Court Weighs Federal Agencies' Duty Under National Environmental Policy Act](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/nationallawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/398/2024/05/Oil-pump-jack-767x633.jpg)
US Supreme Court Weighs Federal Agencies' Duty Under National Environmental Policy Act
![FDA Defends Rejection of Vape-Flavor Applications Before Sympathetic Supreme Court FDA Defends Rejection of Vape-Flavor Applications Before Sympathetic Supreme Court](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/nationallawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/399/2023/10/Vaping-767x633.jpg)
FDA Defends Rejection of Vape-Flavor Applications Before Sympathetic Supreme Court
!['Nuclear Option'?: Eli Lilly Taps Big Law Firms in Federal Drug Pricing Dispute 'Nuclear Option'?: Eli Lilly Taps Big Law Firms in Federal Drug Pricing Dispute](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/nationallawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/390/2024/03/lilly-eli-headquarters-indianapolis-1-767x633.jpg)
'Nuclear Option'?: Eli Lilly Taps Big Law Firms in Federal Drug Pricing Dispute
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1We Must Uphold the Rights of Immigrant Students
- 2Orrick Picks Up 13-Lawyer Tech, VC Group From Gunderson Dettmer
- 3How Alzheimer’s and Other Cognitive Diseases Affect Guardianship, POAs and Estate Planning
- 4How Lower Courts Are Interpreting Justices' Decision in 'Muldrow v. City of St. Louis'
- 5Phantom Income/Retained Earnings and the Potential for Inflated Support
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250