2 Big Law Firms Get $1M-Plus Work Defending DC's Transit Agency in Ad Fight
The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, or WMATA, issued purchase orders authorizing nearly $800,000 in legal fees for the law firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld and nearly $300,000 for Munger, Tolles & Olson.
May 15, 2018 at 01:08 PM
4 minute read
D.C.'s public transportation system, locally called Metro, contracted with Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld and Munger, Tolles & Olson to defend against a lawsuit challenging advertisement policy. Credit: Jay Mallin
The District of Columbia's public transportation system anticipates spending more than $1 million on outside lawyers to defend its refusal last year to allow the Archdiocese of Washington to purchase and run a Christmas advertisement on buses, according to records obtained by The National Law Journal.
The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, or WMATA, issued purchase orders authorizing nearly $800,000 in legal fees for the law firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld and nearly $300,000 for Munger, Tolles & Olson.
The amounts identified in the purchase orders reflect an estimate of the total cost of the defense work, not payments that have already been made to the two firms, said Sonia Bacchus, WMATA's chief counsel for customer service and regulatory affairs. “It is the calculation of what we think it will cost,” she said.
The Akin Gump purchase order is dated Dec. 15, and two Munger Tolles agreements were authorized in December and January.
None of the records publicly reveal the hourly rates the firms proposed to WMATA. The agency's in-house legal team said it redacted rates, cost estimates and other business information “that would put both WMATA and our contractors at a competitive disadvantage if released because it would likely impact WMATA's ability to get the best price and would also impact our contractors' ability to negotiate rates.”
Donald Verrilli Jr.The archdiocese case, which is pending in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, pits veterans of the Supreme Court against each other. In that court, Munger Tolles partner Donald Verrilli Jr., a former President Barack Obama-era U.S. solicitor general, faced off in March against Kirkland & Ellis partner Paul Clement, a solicitor general during the George W. Bush administration.
In the trial court, Akin Gump's Rex Heinke, arguing for WMATA, successfully convinced U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson to deny the archdiocese's request for a preliminary order that would have required WMATA to run the advertisements on bus exteriors. The archdiocese appealed Jackson's Dec. 8 ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
In a letter to WMATA, Anthony Pierce, the Akin Gump partner in charge of the firm's Washington office, pitched Heinke as a “seasoned litigator” who was “intimately familiar with WMATA and [its] advertising concerns” based on two previous engagements with WMATA. His letter to WMATA appeared to specify hourly rates, but they were redacted in the copy provided to the National Law Journal. Heinke is a Los Angeles-based co-leader of the firm's Supreme Court and appellate practice.
In earlier unrelated cases, Heinke defended WMATA against a lawsuit brought by the American Freedom Defense Initiative, which sued over the agency's refusal to run an advertisement on buses and subway station dioramas featuring the prophet Muhammad. A federal district judge in Washington granted summary judgment to WMATA in March 2017. The American Freedom Defense Initiative, represented by attorneys from the Freedom Law Center, appealed to the D.C. Circuit, where the case is pending.
Pierce's proposal also cited a case that challenged Metro's refusal to allow Carafem, a women's health care collective, to advertise abortion services. The case, brought last year by the American Civil Liberties Union, also challenged the removal of advertisements promoting a book by the conservative provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos. A federal judge in March denied Yiannopoulos' bid for a preliminary injunction that would have forced WMATA to repost the ads.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
Financial Watchdog Alleges Walmart Forced Army of Gig-Worker Drivers to Receive Pay Through High-Fee Accounts
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250