Rosenstein Extols DOJ's Embrace of Ethics as Trump Derides Russia 'Witch Hunt'
The deputy attorney general's planned remarks to a compliance audience in Washington did not reference Trump's demand for an investigation of the FBI. “We stress the need to act ethically and to do justice. We expect our prosecutors, our law enforcement agents and other personnel to be thinking about their ethical obligations with every decision that we make,” Rosenstein said at the event, hosted by Compliance Week.
May 21, 2018 at 12:31 PM
5 minute read
Rod Rosenstein, deputy attorney general at the U.S. Department of Justice, speaks in October at the 18th annual Legal Reform Summit, held at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Credit: Diego M. Radzinschi / NLJ
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein on Monday highlighted the U.S. Department of Justice's efforts to instill a sense of ethical responsibility within its ranks, a day after President Donald Trump demanded an investigation into whether the department or the FBI “infiltrated or surveilled” his campaign for political purposes.
Trump's demand, made in a Sunday tweet, struck some legal observers as going beyond his regular approach of impugning the department's integrity and crossing into the more questionable territory of ordering up an investigation. The department responded by asking its internal watchdog, the Office of Inspector General, to expand an ongoing inquiry into the surveillance of a former Trump campaign official. Rosenstein said Sunday: “If anyone did infiltrate or surveil participants in a presidential campaign for inappropriate purposes, we need to know about it and take appropriate action.”
Speaking at a conference in Washington, Rosenstein on Monday did not directly address Trump's Sunday diatribe about the Russia investigation, which the president again derided as a “witch hunt.” Rosenstein, standing before a crowd of corporate compliance professionals gathered for the event, hosted by Compliance Week Inc., spoke generally about the inspector general's office and other sections that collectively serve as the DOJ's own compliance department.
“The Department of Justice faces some of the same challenges companies do. We work to instill a culture of compliance from the first day a new lawyer takes the oath of office in the Department of Justice,” Rosenstein said in his remarks.
“We stress the need to act ethically and to do justice. We expect our prosecutors, our law enforcement agents and other personnel to be thinking about their ethical obligations with every decision that we make,” he added. “And we have integrated that into the daily operations of our business. Newly hired attorneys undergo significant training, including training about professionalism and ethics. We impose other mandatory, annual professionalism requirements, and we follow up and require our attorneys to complete them.”
Rosenstein's response to Trump's Sunday tweets marked just the latest instance of the DOJ inspector general's office finding itself in national headlines. Trump complained in February that the surveillance investigation had been handed over to the inspector general, Michael Horowitz, saying the move was “disgraceful” and that the inquiry would “take forever.”
Rosenstein stressed that the inspector general's office and the separate Office of Professional Responsibility serve as the “internal affairs watchdogs for ethical issues and other violations of department rules and policies.” In 1994, five years after the creation of the inspector general's office, the Justice Department started the Professional Responsibility Officer Program, which put a legal expert in ethics “in each one of our components,” Rosenstein said.
“And,” he added, “we formally created a professional responsibility advisory office in 1999 to provide a centralized hub for advice on ethics throughout the department.”
For at least the third time in recent weeks, Rosenstein also used his public remarks to draw attention to the U.S. Senate's delay confirming several nominees for top Justice Department posts, including the Trump administration's picks to lead the criminal, civil and civil rights divisions.
Two minutes into his remarks, Rosenstein said he was “very honored to be here”—but appeared to long for more Senate-confirmed company atop the Justice Department.
“Two months ago, I received invitations to several corporate fraud-related events focused on the department's role, and I expected to delegate some of these events to those outstanding nominees for assistant attorney general who are awaiting confirmation by the United States Senate,” Rosenstein said. “Drawing on their highly qualified backgrounds and experiences, they would help implement and spread our message about deterring corporate fraud and promoting the rule of law. Unfortunately only two of the seven litigating divisions of the Department of Justice have Senate-confirmed leaders.”
Rosenstein named Kirkland & Ellis partners Brian Benczkowski and Jeffrey Clark, the administration's picks to lead the criminal and environmental divisions, respectively. He noted that the Senate also has yet to vote on the nominations of Jody Hunt for the Civil Division and Jones Day partner Eric Dreiband for the Civil Rights Division.
“Most of them have been waiting an entire year to get a vote for an executive branch job that typically only lasts for a few years,” Rosenstein said. “It's not a way to run a government.”
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHolland & Knight, Akin, Crowell, Barnes and Day Pitney Add to DC Practices
3 minute read'There Is No Time to Waste': Matt Gaetz Withdraws From AG Nomination
3 minute readRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250