Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher
Over the past year, no crisis facing big business has seemed too much for Gibson Dunn. The firm successfully handled high-stakes regulatory cases, including taking down the Department of Labor's fiduciary rule.
May 28, 2018 at 09:00 PM
4 minute read
This profile is part of the NLJ's 2018 Litigation Department of the Year special package. Find a full list of winners and finalists here.
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher's winning streak in 2017 was marked by cases that may prove instructive for future litigation, including those that took down an Obama-era regulation, enabled a controversial $4 billion oil pipeline project to move forward and squashed class actions directed at wide-reaching cyberattacks and claims of mislabeled snack food.
No crisis facing big business seemed too much for the Washington, D.C., powerhouse, which last year became the go-to firm for handling high-stakes regulatory cases.
“We have been enormously fortunate to have unusual and challenging matters that required more creative and non-rote approaches to advocacy,” said Joe Warin, co-chair of the firm's D.C. office litigation department.
Fighting federal regulations, for example, is typically not a winning proposition. He estimated that more than 90 percent of the time federal agency regulations are upheld. At the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, D.C. partner Eugene Scalia is credited with taking down the Department of Labor's fiduciary rule, which essentially requires brokers to act in the best interest of their clients. The rule was voided by the appeals court in March.
In several of the firm's major cases, the attorneys were able to halt scattered and widespread class action lawsuits. In a case before the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, partner Andrew Tulumello won a class action against PepsiCo Inc. and its affiliates over claims of false and misleading labeling. Tulumello also successfully argued before the U.S. Supreme Court in a BNSF Railway case that reinforced constitutional limits on personal jurisdiction. Gibson Dunn won the PepsiCo and BNSF cases in June 2017.
“We took loss after loss in the Montana courts, but ultimately came away—after several years of litigation—with a definitive and enduring 8-1 win that ended truly abusive forum-shopping against our client on a nationwide basis,” Tulumello said of the BNSF win.
The firm defeated other class actions in other federal courts, as well, including overlapping lawsuits arising from a 2015 cyberattack on the Office of Personnel Management. In March 2017, partner Miguel Estrada also successfully fought an attempt by Native American tribes to halt the construction of the Dakota Access oil pipeline project in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Warin said many of these cases will be instructive in the future, particularly with emerging cyberspace cases and others involving the regulatory approval of building pipelines.
“As you can imagine, you can have a death by thousand cuts if you are in multiple courts. You have to hit it right on each one,” Warin said. “As opposed to have diffusion of cases across the country and you essentially orchestrate a common strategy through all those.”
Firm Facts
Name of firm: Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher
Founded: Los Angeles
Total number of attorneys: 1,370
Litigators as percentage of firm: 59 percent
Litigators as percentage in D.C.: 83 percent
Litigation partners firmwide: 204
Litigation associates firmwide: 575
D.C. litigation partners: 50
D.C. litigation associates: 126
Keys to Success
- It is imperative that the team has a granular understanding of facts and forges a compelling narrative based on factual distillation.
- At the outset of an engagement, we trigger deep dive strategic sessions and arrive at a core strategic plan and themes which are reinforced in every step of the litigation.
- We daily embrace vigorous advocacy making every viable legal theory consistent with our core strategic themes at all times never personalizing the litigation.
—F. Joseph Warin
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Conversation with NLJ Lifetime Achievement Award Winner Jeh Johnson
'As I've Grown Older': John Morgan Looks Back at a Life in Law
Binance's Singapore-Based General Counsel Is Shattering Crypto's 'Bro Ceiling'
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Commission Confirms Three of Newsom's Appellate Court Picks
- 2Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
- 3GEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
- 4'Professional Misconduct': Maryland Supreme Court Disbars 86-Year-Old Attorney
- 5Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250