Latham & Watkins
In 2017, Latham stayed trial-ready and delivered big results for clients in high-stakes matters, including defending a client against a $90 Billion reverse False Claims Act lawsuit.
May 28, 2018 at 09:00 PM
4 minute read
This profile is part of the NLJ's 2018 Litigation Department of the Year special package. Find a full list of winners and finalists here.
In 2017, Latham & Watkins' litigators successfully navigated a high-stakes landscape with cases that featured both a breadth and depth of practice areas and some novel legal issues.
“We want to have, in any contested matter, a team that is going to be trial-ready, and everything we do in the context of litigation is to that end,” said Douglas Greenburg, co-chair of the firm's Washington, D.C., litigation and trial department. “That is what leads to the best results even if the case is not one that is going to be tried.”
That philosophy was reflected in the defense of a $90 billion reverse False Claims Act lawsuit against Latham client The Dow Chemical Co. and three other major chemical manufacturers that, if successful, would have opened a floodgate of new FCA lawsuits under any statute that allows potential penalties.
The claim—brought by a law firm acting on behalf of the federal government—alleged the companies cheated the United States out of money by not paying fines for allegedly failing to report risk information about certain chemicals to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as required by the federal Toxic Substances Control Act.
Thus, the suit alleged, they owed the government $90 billion, 30 percent, or roughly $27 billion, of which would have gone to the relator law firm.
Latham lawyers, led by partner Alice Fisher, first prevailed on a motion to transfer the case from California to D.C. federal court, which in October granted the companies' motion to dismiss the case, writing that because the EPA had not yet assessed or levied any fines, the companies did not have an “obligation” to pay the government.
In addition to “highlighting [the firm's] ability and willingness to litigate these difficult issues,” the case also illustrated Latham's proficiency across a wide swath of law, including white collar and environmental, Greenburg said.
In another precedent-setting case, Latham lawyers settled investigations by both the Federal Trade Commission and New Jersey Attorney General's Office into smart TV maker Vizio Inc.'s data collection, use and sharing. In the process, though, new standards for such policies were set, providing much-needed clarity to the smart TV and other industries, said Jennifer Archie, lead partner on the case.
“The pressure was on us to get that clarity in a way that was good for the [client's] brand, good for their business plan and good for the consumer,” Archie said. “I love this work because it is at the intersection of enforcement, but, at the same time, the outcome is going to have huge consequences … I'm particularly proud of the outcome.”
|Firm Facts
Name of firm: Latham & Watkins
Founded: Los Angeles
Total number of attorneys: 2,532
Litigators as percentage of firm: 30 percent
Litigators as percentage in D.C.: 50 percent
Litigation partners firmwide: 206
Litigation associates firmwide: 516
D.C. litigation partners: 52
D.C. litigation associates: 96
Keys to Success
- Business-minded approach: The business imperative forms a strategy that is backed by creativity, practicality and a relentless pursuit of pulling out all the stops to succeed.
- Trial-readiness: Our battle-tested teams bring unmatched experience, judgment and a success-focused mindset whether in court, an agency or other venue.
- Cohesion: We assemble the best team—drawing on colleagues' many skills—into a cohesive, results-driven unit.
—Amanda Reeves, global co-chair of Latham & Watkins' antitrust and competition practice
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Conversation with NLJ Lifetime Achievement Award Winner Jeh Johnson
'As I've Grown Older': John Morgan Looks Back at a Life in Law
Binance's Singapore-Based General Counsel Is Shattering Crypto's 'Bro Ceiling'
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 2Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
- 3State Bar of Georgia Presents Access to Justice Pro Bono Awards
- 4Tips For Creating Holiday Plans That Everyone Can Be Grateful For
- 5Red Tape, Talent Wars & Pricey Office Space Greet Firms Entering Saudi Arabia
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250