Steptoe & Johnson
A major asbestos-related insurance coverage dispute ruling at the Fourth Circuit will have lasting significance not only as Maryland law, but likely will be followed in other circuits around the country.
May 28, 2018 at 09:00 PM
4 minute read
In 2017, Steptoe & Johnson won a major victory in U.S. District Court on behalf of client St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co., now a subsidiary of Travelers, in a major asbestos-related insurance coverage dispute with Walter E. Campbell Co. (WECCO), an insulation firm based in Maryland.
At issue was the application of In Re Wallace & Gale, 385 F.3d 820, and the “completed operations hazard clause” found in various insurance policies that limits the exposure of insurance companies against claims by policyholders such as WECCO.
In this instance, the completed operations hazard clause limited the exposure of Travelers to indemnify WECCO against claims for hundreds of pending and future injury cases totaling more than $30 million.
“In Re Wallace & Gale set limits on asbestos-related claims and created winners and losers in asbestos cases,” said Harry Lee, co-chairman of Steptoe's insurance, reinsurance and professional liability practice. “So counsel for WECCO took a run at eviscerating Wallace & Gale, which would have had an industrywide effect. We were facing very good counsel, and the stakes were extremely high.”
Lee said a turning point in the case came on March 10, 2017, when Judge William Nickerson of the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland issued his third straight partial summary judgment ruling in favor of Travelers.
“A number of insurers settled and only two hung on to the end, but once we got the district court judge to understand the issues and agree with us on our procedural arguments regarding venue and choice of law, i.e., that the case should not be subject to any other law except that of the state of Maryland, I thought the tide was turning in our favor,” Lee explained.
On March 26, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit upheld the Maryland federal court's ruling that Travelers has no further duty to cover WECCO's costs to defend and settle asbestos injury claims.
“The main questions at issue in this appeal—concerning both the scope and limit of the Insurers' duties to defend and indemnify WECCO—were answered over a decade ago by this Court in In re Wallace & Gale Co., 385 F.3d 820, 833–34 (4th Cir. 2004),” wrote Circuit Court Judge James Wynn for the majority. “Unsatisfied with our precedent and the effect it would have on its cause of action, WECCO asks us to either consider these questions anew or certify them to the Maryland Court of Appeals….we decline to do either.”
Lee said the Fourth Circuit ruling will have lasting significance. “With two wins over 15 years over the same issue in the Fourth Circuit, not only will this be Maryland law, but likely will be followed in the Fourth Circuit and in other circuits around
the country.”
Firm Facts
Name of firm: Steptoe & Johnson
Founded: Washington
Total number of attorneys: 480
Litigators as percentage of firm: 50 percent
Litigators as percentage in D.C.: 50 percent
Litigation partners firmwide: 101
Litigation associates firmwide: 106
D.C. insurance litigation partners: 10
D.C. insurance litigation associates: 2
Keys to Success
- Cultivate and insist on generational succession and generational coverage; we have lawyers in their 70s and in their 20s and all ages in between.
- Focus on clients' emerging risks, such as cyber, drones, autonomous vehicles and climate change.
- Spend a lot of time listening to clients, and considering how you can make their jobs easier.— Harry Lee
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Absurd Costs'?: Visa Faces Antitrust Class-Action Surge Following DOJ Complaint
3 minute read'Systemic and Pervasive'?: DiCello Levitt Alleges WWE Child Sexual Abuse Scandal
3 minute readThe 2024 NLJ Awards: Professional Excellence—Appellate Hot List
4th Circuit Revives Workplace Retaliation Lawsuit Against Biden's HHS Secretary
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1UK Startup Wexler AI Announces $1.4M Preseed Funding
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-70
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Standing for Plaintiffs in Copyright Suit Over AI Training of ChatGPT
- 4LA Judge Anne Hwang Confirmed to the Federal Bench
- 5NY Court Leaders Ask for 10% Judiciary Budget Increase
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250