US Wants to Implant Compliance Officers at China's ZTE Corp.
U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross told CNBC last week that the U.S. is considering a plan that would lift the export ban against China's second-largest telecom company. It would require ZTE to implant U.S.-chosen compliance officers, who would report back to the U.S. Department of Commerce.
May 30, 2018 at 06:11 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross Jr. is scheduled to visit China June 2 to June 4 to resume trade talks, and perhaps reach an agreement on lifting a seven-year ban on exports of parts and technology to Chinese telecom giant ZTE Corp.
Ross told CNBC last week that the U.S. is considering a plan that would lift the export ban. It would require ZTE to implant U.S.-chosen compliance officers, who would report back to the U.S. Department of Commerce, Ross said.
ZTE has not had good luck with its own legal and compliance officers. The South China Morning Post reported in April that after the ban was imposed, the company removed senior vice president Cheng Gang from his roles as chief compliance officer and chief legal officer.
ZTE had also replaced its previous chief legal officer in 2017, after the U.S. Department of Justice prosecuted the company for illegally shipping equipment incorporating U.S. technology to Iran and North Korea.
The company pleaded guilty and reached a plea deal that included numerous compliance reforms and $900 million in sanctions. The prosecution came after its former U.S. general counsel, Ashley Yablon, agreed to be a whistleblower for the U.S. attorney. Yablon has since joined another company as in-house counsel.
It was a violation of the plea deal that led Ross to impose the previously suspended seven-year ban in mid-April, blocking the company from buying and exporting needed parts and technology from U.S. companies. Without U.S. parts, ZTE had to suspend operations.
Then on May 13, President Donald Trump said he wanted to ease the restrictions and allow ZTE to reopen for business. Since then, Ross has been working on hammering out a new deal for ZTE, China's second-largest telecom company, which is publicly traded but whose largest shareholder is a state-backed entity.
Some news reports said any new deal with ZTE to lift the ban would also include a $1.3 billion fine, on top of a record $1.1 billion penalty imposed last year. Other reports said a deal might also include an agreement to buy more U.S. farm products. ZTE has not responded to messages seeking comment.
But Republican Sen. Marco Rubio, among critics of the proposal in the U.S. government and business communities, on Sunday threatened Trump's proposal to lift the ban.
Speaking on ABC News, Rubio said he regarded the ZTE ban as a question not only of enforcing trade sanctions but as a matter of national security. “They steal our intellectual property, they force our companies to transfer this stuff over, and the only way that we are going to stop them is so they face significant consequences for continuing what they are doing,” Rubio claimed.
Rubio said putting ZTE out of business by leaving the export ban in place “is the kind of significant consequence that China would respond to, to understand that we're serious.”
He added, “While the administration is viewing it solely as recalibrating the punishment on ZTE, the sanctions, I'm viewing it as an opportunity to impose a real cost on China for everything else that they're doing.”
Rubio said Congress is considering legislation to block any sale of high-tech equipment to Chinese companies, including ZTE and the even larger Huawei Technologies Inc.
In another interview on CBS's “Face the Nation” on Sunday, Rubio said he believes Congress has a bipartisan, supermajority vote that could override any Trump veto on the matter.
“I think there's a growing commitment in Congress to do something about what China is trying to do to the United States,” he said.
Apparently trying to appease Congress, Trump on Tuesday reversed an earlier decision to hold back on tariffs against China. The White House announced the U.S. would impose 25 percent tariffs on $50 billion worth of goods imported from China containing “industrially significant technology.”
The statement said, “To protect our national security, the United States will implement specific investment restrictions and enhanced export controls for Chinese persons and entities related to the acquisition of industrially significant technology. The proposed investment restrictions and enhanced export controls will be announced by June 30, 2018.”
It remains to be seen how the tariffs announcement might affect the ZTE negotiations and the trade talks.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All4th Circuit Upholds Virginia Law Restricting Online Court Records Access
3 minute read'Where Were the Lawyers?' Judge Blocks Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order
3 minute readRFK Jr. Will Keep Affiliations With Morgan & Morgan, Other Law Firms If Confirmed to DHHS
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 2Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 3Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 4Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
- 5Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250