When Supreme Court Justices Turn to 'Mr. Bumble' to Make a Point: Alito Edition
Justice Samuel Alito Jr. shares with Justice Neil Gorsuch more than just a firm conservative bent. They both have a fondness for a certain Dickens character to make a point about how their colleagues interpret the law.
May 30, 2018 at 02:53 PM
6 minute read
Justice Samuel Alito Jr. shares with Justice Neil Gorsuch more than just a firm conservative bent. They both have a fondness for a certain Dickens character to make a point about how their colleagues interpret the law.
Alito stood alone in dissent this week in a key Fourth Amendment decision. He found unreasonable the majority's disapproval of a police officer's warrantless search of a motorcycle parked in the driveway of a home.
To drive home his point, Alito turned to Mr. Bumble:
An ordinary person of common sense would react to the court's decision the way Mr. Bumble famously responded when told about a legal rule that did not comport with the reality of everyday life,” Alito wrote. “If that is the law, he exclaimed, 'the law is a ass—a idiot.' C. Dickens, Oliver Twist 277 (1867).
Two years ago, Gorsuch, then a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, famously borrowed the same character and quote from the Charles Dickens novel, “Oliver Twist,” in his dissent in the case of the burping middle school boy. A school police officer arrested the boy who refused to stop generating fake burps. The boy was charged with disrupting the education process and suspended from school. His mother sued school officials and the police officer.
Gorsuch, dissenting from the majority's decision in favor of the school officials and police officer, wrote:
Often enough the law can be “a ass—a idiot,” Charles Dickens, Oliver Twist 520 (Dodd, Mead & Co. 1941) (1838)—and there is little we judges can do about it, for it is (or should be) emphatically our job to apply, not rewrite, the law enacted by the people's representatives. … It's only that, in this particular case, I don't believe the law happens to be quite as much of a ass [sic] as they do.
The legal writing guru Ross Guberman wrote of Gorsuch's literary reference: “Like Justice [Antonin] Scalia, Judge Gorsuch is nothing if not erudite. Many judges cite Charles Dickens's 'Bleak House,' so I appreciate Gorsuch's amusing reference to 'Oliver Twist.'”
A quick search of Brigham Young University's Corpus, home to about 130 million words in 32,000 Supreme Court decisions from the 1790s to the present, revealed that at least two other justices have turned to Mr. Bumble's infamous comment.
The earliest use was in the 1959 decision In re Sawyer, by Justice William Brennan. The court was reviewing a lawyer's one-year suspension from the practice of law flowing in part from interviews she conducted with one of the jurors after the trial.
Brennan wrote: “How any of this reflected on Judge Wiig, except insofar as he might be thought to lose stature because he was a judge in a legal system said to be full of imperfections, is not shown. To say that 'the law is a ass, a idiot' is not to impugn the character of those who must administer it. To say that prosecutors are corrupt is not to impugn the character of judges who might be unaware of it, or be able to find no method under the law of restraining them.”
Nearly two decades later, in a case argued and won by then-ACLU lawyer Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Mr. Bumble appeared in a concurring opinion by Justice John Paul Stevens. The case, Califano v. Goldfarb, struck down the different treatment of widows and widowers for awarding Social Security survivor benefits.
Stevens, who concurred in the judgment, addressed the 19th century presumption that females were inferior to males. He explained in a footnote:
This presumption was expressly recognized in the literature of the 19th century. It was this presumption that Mr. Bumble ridiculed when he disclaimed responsibility for his wife's misconduct. Because a part of his disclaimer is so well known, it may not be inappropriate to quote the entire passage:
“It was all Mrs. Bumble. She would do it,” urged Mr. Bumble, first looking round to ascertain that his partner had left the room.
“That is no excuse,” replied Mr. Brownlow. “You were present on the occasion of the destruction of these trinkets, and, indeed, are the more guilty of the two in the eye of the law, for the law supposes that your wife acts under your direction.”
“If the law supposes that,” said Mr. Bumble, squeezing his hat emphatically in both hands, “the law is a ass—a idiot. If that's the eye of the law, the law's a bachelor; and the worst I wish the law is that his eye may be opened by experience—by experience.”
Although Dickens can claim credit for making the phrase famous, the British website The Phrase Finder says “the law is an ass” first appeared in a play published by dramatist George Chapman in 1654—”Revenge for Honour”: “Ere he shall lose an eye for such trifle. … For doing deeds of nature! I'm ashamed. The law is such an ass.”
The Phrase Finder adds that “ass” is the English colloquial name for a donkey, “not the American 'ass,' which we will leave behind us at this point.”
Read more:
After the 'Epic' Ruling, Is #Gorsuchstyle a Thing of the Past?
In Quoting Profanity, Some Judges Give a F#%&. Others Don't
Take a 'Journey' Through the Justices' Bookshelves
Finding the Justice with the Most Literary Chops
Kagan: Law Schools Must Do More to Boost Student Writing Skills
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBankruptcy Judge Clears Path for Recovery in High-Profile Crypto Failure
3 minute readGovernment Attorneys Face Reassignment, Rescinded Job Offers in First Days of Trump Administration
4 minute readDC Judge Chutkan Allows Jenner's $8M Unpaid Legal Fees Lawsuit to Proceed Against Sierra Leone
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250