7th Circuit Strips Jones Day's $307K Legal-Fee Award in EEOC Case
"The EEOC's theory was not that fruitless. Precedent may not have favored it, but the fee statute does not punish a civil rights litigant for pursuing a novel, even if ambitious, theory," Seventh Circuit Chief Justice Diane Wood wrote Friday. Jones Day's Eric Dreiband was chief counsel for CVS in the litigation.
June 08, 2018 at 06:09 PM
4 minute read
A federal appeals court on Friday reversed a $307,0000 attorney fee award that was granted to CVS Pharmacy Inc.'s lawyers at Jones Day in a dispute the company won against the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, ruling unanimously, said the trial court judge should not have awarded fees to CVS even though the company prevailed against the EEOC. The agency claimed in its lawsuit that CVS was using a severance agreement that interfered with employees' workplace rights under federal law.
Jones Day, represented by partner Eric Dreiband, said attorney fees were justified for the EEOC's “baseless” lawsuit and that regulators had unfairly targeted the company for alleged employment abuses. A trial court determined the agency ran afoul of internal regulations and was barred from bringing the “pattern or practice” enforcement action. The appeals court, at an earlier stage in the case, upheld the dismissal of the EEOC's suit.
Chief Justice Diane Wood of the Seventh Circuit said Friday that the EEOC's litigation position was not so far afield as to warrant an award of attorney fees to CVS's attorneys.
“The EEOC's theory was not that fruitless. Precedent may not have favored it, but the fee statute does not punish a civil rights litigant for pursuing a novel, even if ambitious, theory,” Wood wrote.
The EEOC sued CVS in 2014 over a severance agreement the agency said limited the rights of employees to file complaints. The EEOC called the severance agreement “overly broad” and argued it was part of a CVS “pattern or practice of resistance” to restrict the civil rights of the company's employees. The agency lost its case in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.
Dreiband, formerly the head of Jones Day's labor and employment group, in 2016 identified his hourly rate at $560. He is now awaiting confirmation as the Trump administration's pick to lead the U.S. Department of Justice 's Civil Rights Division. Ninth-year associate Yaakov Roth, a former clerk to the late U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, billed at $475 per hour in 2016, and Nikki McArthur at $275 per hour, according to court records. Dreiband was not immediately reached for comment Friday.
“EEOC violated both Title VII and its own regulations when it refused CVS's pleas to try to resolve the matter in conciliation and spurned CVS's offers to clarify its agreement's terms,” Dreiband wrote in a court filing. “EEOC instead rushed to file a baseless lawsuit, and blasted CVS with an inflammatory press release falsely accusing the company of interfering with Title VII rights.”
CVS's lawyers said the trial judge “acted well within his discretion when he ordered EEOC to reimburse a portion of the attorneys' fees incurred by CVS in defending against a baseless but expensive suit that should never have been filed in the first place.”
The EEOC did not immediately comment about the appeals court ruling.
The Seventh Circuit's decision is posted below:
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'New Circumstances': Winston & Strawn Seek Expedited Relief in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute read5th Circuit Rules Open-Source Code Is Not Property in Tornado Cash Appeal
5 minute readDOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
Trending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250