Judge Appoints Special Master in Flint Water Contamination Case
A federal judge in Michigan has refused to remove lead attorneys in the Flint water contamination case but plans to bring in a special master to review their fees and expenses.
June 20, 2018 at 05:10 PM
5 minute read
A federal judge in Michigan has refused to remove lead attorneys in the Flint water contamination case but plans to bring in a special master to review their fees and expenses.
In an order on Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Judith Levy in Ann Arbor refused to grant a motion brought by Ted Leopold and Michael Pitt, co-lead counsel for a consolidated class action, to remove Hunter Shkolnik from his post as co-liaison counsel to the individual cases. They claimed Shkolnik was luring prospective class members into signing illegal retainer agreements with his firm, New York-based Napoli Shkolnik.
Shkolnik fired back with his own motion to remove Leopold, of Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, and Pitt, of Pitt McGehee Palmer and Rivers in Royal Oak, Michigan. In his motion, Shkolnik called the action to remove him a “blatant money grab” and requested the court name a special master to review submissions to the common benefit fund, which goes to lead plaintiffs attorneys who work on contingency fee for the class.
Levy's decisions to reject the motions from all sides left the Flint leadership team intact. Following a hearing on Monday, she didn't outline her reasons for denying the motions.
But she placed term limits on her leadership appointments. All of the appointments are set to expire on Dec. 31, although they may apply for reappointment. Those applications must be filed by Nov. 16 under the court order.
Levy also said she planned to bring in Deborah Greenspan, a partner at Blank Rome in Washington, D.C., to serve as special master.
Greenspan was special master in a settlement program involving Vietnam War veterans exposed to Agent Orange. A former law partner of Kenneth Feinberg, she also was deputy special master for the 9/11 victim compensation fund. Greenspan, who joined Blank Rome from Dickstein Shapiro in 2016, became the focus of an audit last year by the U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General. The report raised concerns about a potential conflict of interest Greenspan might have after the Sept. 11 fund gave more than $3.6 million worth of contracts to her law firms.
In her order, Levy wrote that the special master would handle time and expense administration, coordinate with lawyers in other cases and handle discovery matters “as needed.” She ordered all objections or “potential reasons for Ms. Greenspan's disqualification” be filed by July 2.
In a separate time and expense order, she required lawyers to submit their records monthly to the special master. She also ordered that the special master audit the common benefit fund on a quarterly basis.
“We are happy with Judge Levy's denial of the motion to replace me and look forward to working with the special master she appoints in the implementation of time and expense order,” Shkolnik said. “Clearly my dogged pursuit to rein in class counsels' billing practices was the impetus of the motion against me and now this has been taken care of.”
Shkolnik, whose firm has represented 9/11 victims, said he supported Greenspan as special master.
Greenspan did not respond to a request for comment. Leopold and Pitt also did not respond.
The lawsuits target engineering firms and more than a dozen government officials over the 2014 decision to shift the city's water supply from Lake Huron to the Flint River, despite studies warning the corrosive nature of the river could risk lead getting into the drinking water supply.
Last summer, Levy appointed Pitt and Leopold as lead counsel for all the class actions in federal court, and Shkolnik and Corey Stern, of Levy Konigsberg, as co-liaison for hundreds of individual cases, most of which involve medical claims. The lawyers have filed separate complaints, but many of their allegations overlap.
The dispute arose as both sides are meeting with two mediators, one of whom is former U.S. Sen. Carl Levin, D-Michigan.
On March 12, Leopold and Pitt filed a motion to remove Shkolnik, alleging he swiped their clients while demanding that he and Stern get 40 percent of a potential common benefit fund, plus their contingency fees.
Shkolnik, in his own motion, said Leopold and Pitt had their own demands, which would have netted them 80 percent of common benefit fees. They also had “secret side-fee deals” with other law firms, he said.
Even one of the defendants, Veolia North America, weighed in with concerns about how all three lawyers were communicating with potential class members.
Stern called on both sides to reach a truce for the sake of the Flint litigation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Unlawful Release'?: Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute readFederal Judge Grants FTC Motion Blocking Proposed Kroger-Albertsons Merger
3 minute readFrozen-Potato Producers Face Profiteering Allegations in Surge of Antitrust Class Actions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250