The NLJ 500: Large Firm Growth Slows Amid Consolidation and Contraction
Lawyer counts increased by 1 percent, but large firm growth was slowed due to consolidation. Just three of the top five firms on the NLJ 500 showed total lawyer headcount growth: Hogan Lovells, Baker McKenzie and Norton Rose Fulbright.
June 28, 2018 at 12:01 AM
5 minute read
Total lawyer headcount growth slowed last year nationwide, hampered by the contraction of smaller firms and consolidation at firms of all sizes.
Personalize NLJ 500 and Am Law 200 data using year-over-year comparison plus Lateral, Office, and Event Trends. Learn More
The number of lawyers who worked in the nation's 500 largest firms increased 1 percent over the previous year to nearly 165,300, and the average firm size rose by four lawyers to 331. But this growth was somewhat slower than in 2016, when the NLJ 500 grew by approximately 2 percent.
This year's edition of the NLJ 500 also shows a 1.2 percent drop in the number of equity partners, while the number of total partners remained effectively flat at 0.3 percent. The gap between the NLJ 350 and the NLJ 500 was especially pronounced in 2017, with growth among the top 350 firms far outpacing the final 150 included in this year's list. All of the final 25 firms included in the NLJ 500 either shrunk or were not previously ranked.
But the competitive pressures acutely facing smaller firms did not bypass the nation's largest firms. Just three of the top five firms on the NLJ 500 showed total lawyer headcount growth: Hogan Lovells, Baker McKenzie and Norton Rose Fulbright. After the Norton Rose merger with Chadbourne & Parke was finalized in June 2017, the firm changed the way it reported its headcount numbers from previous years. Per Norton Rose Fulbright spokesman Dan McKenna, for 2016, firm numbers included paralegals and trainees. The firm later adjusted its 2016 tabulation to include 3,221 lawyers for that year. That firm's head count grew by 118 lawyers in 2017.
Hogan Lovells CEO Steve Immelt said he is optimistic about the coming year, but “there's just no question” that the market is flat and new technology, in-house counsel, and disaggregation have depressed on demand.
“Boy it's a tough market,” Immelt said. “I think anybody that doesn't understand that is going to have a really challenging time and law firms that have hunkered down and said, 'Let's cut costs and wait until it's 2007 again' are going to be challenged.”
Hope remains for smaller firms, however, said Steve Nelson, a legal recruiter and consultant with the McCormick Group, an executive search firm. Nelson said the advantage smaller firms have is that they ought to be able to compete better on rates. Nelson said the contraction of the smaller firms in the 2018 NLJ 500 looks to be a response to firms struggling to respond to flat revenues.
Personalize NLJ 500 and Am Law 200 data using year-over-year comparison plus Lateral, Office, and Event Trends. Learn More
“I think these firms are facing challenges in terms of the competitiveness of the marketplace,” Nelson said. “They're in that space where the corporate efforts to cut costs are really taking hold.”
Rather than being entirely swallowed up by bigger firms or moving in-house in droves, some of the movement at the back-end of the NLJ 500 reveals lawyers moving to smaller firms or starting their own firms, Nelson said.
Additionally, combinations at some of the nation's largest firms have had a profound impact on the market. Arnold & Porter ranked 63 on last year's list, for example, but improved its ranking to 31 following its merger with Kaye Scholer.
The aftershocks of major mergers affecting this year's list continue to be felt throughout Big Law. Norton Rose Fulbright's combination with Chadbourne & Parke not only changed its total headcount, but that of other firms. The movement of legacy Chadbourne partners proved beneficial to Winston & Strawn in 2017 and this year. Kirkland & Ellis, the firm that added the greatest number of lawyers in 2017 (238), has similarly recruited legacy Chadbourne lawyers to its offices in 2018. Kirkland & Ellis, per a spokesperson, declined to provide comment for this story.
Other combinations have proven to be a smashing success. Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr's Managing Partner Barry Levin said his firm has never been one to gobble up others and found success due to pre-merger coordination. Saul Ewing's merger with Arnstein & Lehr represented a once-in-a-20-year event for the firm, Levin said. But market pressures could mean that is all about to change.
“Everything happens faster today,” Levin said. “What were 20 year events might be five year events [now].”
➤➤ Hear from the journalists and analysts behind this year's NLJ 500 rankings on the latest Legal Speak podcast.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNelson Mullins, Greenberg Traurig, Jones Day Have Established Themselves As Biggest Outsiders in Atlanta Legal Market
7 minute readGOP Trifecta in Washington Could Put Litigation Finance Industry Under Pressure
'Sharp and Profound' Policy Shifts Prompt DC Law Firms to Evaluate Opportunities, Challenges
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 2Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 3McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
- 4Amazon, SpaceX Press Constitutional Challenges to NLRB at 5th Circuit
- 5Schools Win Again: Social Media Fails to Strike Public Nuisance Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250