Editor's Note: Announcing the 2018 NLJ 500
This month, we release our annual headcount survey of the biggest law firms across the country.
June 29, 2018 at 11:32 AM
3 minute read
It's that time of year again. We're elated to present the 2018 NLJ 500, our annual report ranking the nation's largest 500 U.S.-centric firms. We break out data for total attorneys, partners and largest U.S. offices and our national business of law team contextualizes the numbers.
Two features frame this year's package. Washington, D.C.-based reporter Ryan Lovelace pens our overview story (page 14), and Miriam Rozen, who is based in New York, writes our story on the Women's Scorecard (page 18), which ranks the nation's largest law firms according to their percentages of female attorneys.
What's the big takeaway? Lawyer head counts increased 1 percent over the previous year to nearly 165,300. But, as Lovelace notes, that growth was a bit slower than in 2016, when the NLJ 500 grew by about 2 percent.
Another angle embedded in the data is the impact that law firm mergers have had on the market. Post-merger, for instance, one firm moved up to the No. 31 ranking on the NLJ 500 from its previous ranking of No. 63 on last year's list.
And in the Women's Scorecard, a New York-based firm takes the top spot for the seventh year in a row. How does the firm do it? By creating a “very embracing,” career-nurturing environment, a senior partner says. For more on these and other law firm trends, check out these and other stories in our NLJ 500 report.
Next, Marcia Coyle takes a look back at the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, the case involving a Colorado baker who refused to make a wedding cake for a same-sex couple, citing his religion. The high court ruled 7-2 for the baker on narrow grounds. Did oral arguments in December offer court observers hints on the direction the court would go? And what guidance, if any, does the decision provide for similar cases now moving through the courts? Coyle looks to law professors and her deep knowledge of the court to unpack it all.
Speaking of unpacking, when moving from the government to a private law firm, there are a lot of considerations to weigh. Will the new firm help you grow your practice? Does it have a detailed plan in place to integrate you with firm clients? And are business development expectations realistic? Raphael Prober, co-head of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld's congressional investigations practice and one of the NLJ's 2017 D.C. Rising Stars, delves into the details of making a transition from government to private practice and shares tips for success. It's the latest column in our new series by astute, young lawyers in Washington and beyond. Let us know what you think. Email me at [email protected] or reach out on Twitter via @lhelemNLJ. As always, thanks for reading and stay in touch!
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNLJ December/January Editor's Note: What's Driving White Collar Defense and Antitrust Anxieties
2 minute readApril Editor's Note: Gearing up for Regulatory Action & Why Judges Leave the Bench
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1People in the News—Jan. 9, 2025—Rawle & Henderson, Armstrong Teasdale
- 2Thinking Outside the RFP: AI’s Impact Beyond Scaling Review Efficiency
- 3Special Series Part 4: The Statutory Guardrails Impermissibly Bind Future Legislatures
- 4New York Court of Appeals Blocks Trump Attempt to Stay Friday Sentencing
- 5'Self-Diagnosed Nickel Allergy' Fails to Find Success in Med-Mal Suit, 8th Circuit Rules
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250