Sidley Austin's Peter Keisler Takes on More Formal Role for AT&T in Antitrust Appellate Battle
As the AT&T's defense against a Justice Department antitrust challenge advances into a Washington appeals court, Keisler is set to assume a more formal role.
July 17, 2018 at 12:32 PM
3 minute read
Peter Keisler. Photo by Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM During the six-week trial over AT&T's planned acquisition of Time Warner, Sidley Austin partner Peter Keisler was a constant presence in court, looking on as O'Melveny & Myers' Daniel Petrocelli mounted a successful defense of the $85 billion deal. advances into a Washington appeals court Keisler, a prominent appellate lawyer who briefly served as interim attorney general late in the George W. Bush administration , entered his first appearance for AT&T late Monday afternoon in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, identifying himself as the lead counsel for a Sidley Austin team that includes Jonathan Nuechterlein and C. Frederick Beckner III, co-leaders of the firm's communications regulatory practice. Also on the Sidley Austin team: Richard Klingler, a partner at the firm who previously served as general counsel on the National Security Council staff during the Bush administration. In Keisler, AT&T has a lawyer who was picked under the Bush administration for a seat on the D.C. Circuit, only to see his nomination scuttled by a Senate filibuster. a month after U.S. District Judge Richard Leon handed down a 172-page opinion rejecting arguments that AT&T's acquisition of Time Warner would substantially lessen competition and hurt consumers. Petrocelli, a seasoned trial lawyer who took up AT&T's case with little to no antitrust experience, has not yet entered an appearance in the D.C. Circuit. Cravath, Swaine & Moore partner Christine Varney, a former head of the Justice Department's Antitrust Division, is representing Time Warner. Keisler previously represented AT&T in the challenge to the Federal Communications Commission's net neutrality rules, which the D.C. Circuit upheld in 2016. Under a Trump-appointed Republican chairman, the FCC later repealed the rules, which required internet services providers to treat all content and traffic equally. In 2016, he argued before the D.C. Circuit for an array of trade associations—including the American Chemistry Council Inc. and U.S. Chamber of Commerce—in a challenge to the Obama administration's Clean Power Plan. For the past two years, the D.C. Circuit has been granting 60-day abeyances in the case as the Trump administration's U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has worked to revise the plan. In its most recent order, the D.C. Circuit revealed that some judges' patience with EPA's regulatory inaction is wearing thin. “ It's a very narrow path that would have to be traveled to get this thing reversed in any way," Stephenson said. "The merger is closed. We own Time Warner."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250