Federal Judge Postpones Start of Paul Manafort's Trial
U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis III did not give a reason for the ruling, which came after defense attorneys said they need more time to review documents turned over by prosecutors.
July 23, 2018 at 01:16 PM
2 minute read
A federal judge in Alexandria, Virginia, has postponed Paul Manafort's bank and tax fraud trial by about a week after defense attorneys said they needed more time to review documents handed over by prosecutors. Judge T.S. Ellis III did not give an explanation for his ruling Monday, but jurors will still report to the court Wednesday for questionnaires. Lawyers for the special counsel and Manafort gathered in Ellis's courtroom in the Eastern District of Virginia Monday to settle various pretrial motions, including Manafort's lawyers' bid to continue his trial, which was scheduled to begin Wednesday with jury selection. At the heart of Manafort's lawyers' effort to delay the trial Monday was, in the judge's words, the special counsel office's “data dump” of materials Manafort's lawyers need to review before Wednesday. Most records are from Manafort's bookkeeper—about 49,000 pages' worth, according to Manafort lawyer Kevin Downing—as well as data from Rick Gates' phones and laptop. Gates was a longtime Manafort associate who began cooperating with the special counsel's prosecutors in February. Prosecutor Uzo Asonye said that much of the information from Manafort's bookkeeper had been held up in privilege review. “As soon as we receive them from taint review, we produce them,” Asonye said. Downing, who shook his head in disagreement, said Manafort's legal team did not have access to those records, nor did he get them from Manafort's previous lawyers at Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr. He said Manafort's bookkeeper, who was subpoenaed by the government, would only turn over records if the legal team paid for their production. But they declined to do so, citing the “cheaper” method of obtaining them through discovery. Read more: Manafort Charges Survive Bid for Dismissal in Virginia Paul Manafort to Appeal Judge's Decision Placing Him in Jail Reed Smith Bolsters Readiness in Russia Case, Adding Appellate Duo Paul Manafort's Losing Streak Deepens in Washington Court
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Rampant Piracy': US Record Labels File Copyright Suit Against French Distributor Believe
5 minute read'Rapidly Closing Window': Progressive Groups Urge Senate Votes on Biden's Judicial Nominees
5 minute read11th Circuit Revives Project Veritas' Defamation Lawsuit Against CNN
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250