Catch Up With a Paul Hastings Lobbyist on Crypto, Cannabis & More
What's on Paul Hastings lobbyist Dina Ellis Rochkind's plate? Some of the most cutting-edge regulatory issues around—cryptocurrency, financial technology and cannabis. Catch up here.
July 25, 2018 at 12:53 PM
2 minute read
Paul Hastings offices in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 8, 2016. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM Dina Ellis Rochkind
Paul Hastings signed on to lobby registered to lobby Compliance Hot Spots here here RSS feed NLJ: Your work in 2018 alone has dealt with some of the hottest up-and-coming issues. How have you gotten involved in cryptocurrencies and also financial services for the state-legalized marijuana industry? Last month, Bill Hinman, director of the Securities and Exchange Commission's division of corporate finance, made a splash with a speech in which he said the popular cryptocurrency Ether should not be treated as a security. What did you think of that statement? The SEC, on the enforcement side, has been very active in cracking down on fraudulent coin offerings and is clearly trying to send a message. To what extent has that message gotten through to the wider industry? Hinman What have you been seeing on Capitol Hill in the cryptocurrencies space? Has the revelation about bitcoin being used as part of Russia's interference in the 2016 election complicated matters? What are you looking out for in the area of banking services for state-legal cannabis?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Patent Innovators Can Look to International Trade Commission Enforcement for Protection, IP Lawyers Say
Zuckerman Spaeder Gets Ready to Move Offices in DC, Deploy AI Tools in 2025
5 minute readOutgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
19 minute readEx-Deputy AG Trusts U.S. Legal System To Pull Country Through Times of Duress
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Turning Over Legal Tedium to AI Requires Lots of Unglamorous Work on Front End
- 2Appellate Division Rejects Third Circuit Interpretation of NJ Law, Says No Arbitration for Insurance Fraud
- 3'Merciless' Filing Deadline Dooms Cuban Americans' Property-Trafficking Suit Against BNP Paribas, SocGen
- 4In 2-1 Ruling, Court Clears Way for Decade-Old Wrongful Imprisonment Suit
- 5Trump Sentencing, TikTok Ban Welcome Justices Back to Work
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250