Report: Shareholder Lawsuits Being Filed at Record Pace, and They're Getting Bigger
A record pace of shareholder class action filings continued during the first half of 2018—and the cases are getting much bigger, according to a midyear report released today.
July 25, 2018 at 04:31 PM
4 minute read
A record pace of shareholder class action filings continued during the first half of 2018—and the cases are getting much bigger, according to a midyear report released today.
The report, by Cornerstone Research and Stanford Law School's Securities Class Action Clearinghouse, found 204 filings so far this year. That's on pace to match last year's record total of 412—the highest number of cases filed since 2008.
But, unlike in 2017, the potential dollar value of the cases grew significantly, driven by several mega-filings, which are those seeking at least $5 billion.
“We still have very high volume of traditional cases, and these traditional cases are now getting larger in terms of dollars,” said Sasha Aganin, vice president of Cornerstone Research. “We have some mega-filings, which were relatively rare in the previous couple of cycles, so we're now back to the situation where large cases, or giant cases, reflect a large portion of dollar losses that we are measuring.”
According to the report, the maximum dollar loss, which calculates the total market capitalization decrease during the entire class period, totaled $643 billion in the first half of 2018—the highest semiannual level since the second half of 2002. And the disclosure dollar loss—the value of the market capitalization decrease at the time the alleged misstatements were disclosed—was 162 percent higher than the historical aggregate average of $157 billion.
The report didn't cite specific cases, but one of the biggest shareholder lawsuits filed this year, for example, was against Facebook Inc. following the Cambridge Analytica scandal.
The jump in dollar value is anticipated to continue, Aganin said, particularly as some experts predict a market correction in the second half of 2018. The filings also could lead to larger settlement values, which reached historic lows in 2017, he said.
Filings over mergers and acquisitions continued to play a lead role in the increase, although their numbers dipped slightly this year. Core filings, which include cases brought when a stock price drops, jumped 28 percent from the second half of 2017, the report said.
The report didn't mention the plaintiffs firms filing the cases so far this year. But Aganin said that the same three law firms that drove last year's growth—The Rosen Law Firm and Pomerantz, both in New York, and Los Angeles-based Glancy Prongay & Murray—are “very active” in this year's filings.
The data shows that companies are more likely to face a shareholder class action than ever before. The report anticipated that, as in 2017, shareholders could end up suing 8.5 percent of companies listed on the Nasdaq or New York Stock Exchange this year. That's well above the historic average of 2.9 percent.
“The costs of shareholder litigation are rising,” Aganin said. “There is a high chance a typical company would be sued in a shareholder case, either over an M&A transaction or because of a stock price drop.”
What remains unclear is the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court's March 20 ruling in Cyan v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund, which allowed plaintiffs to bring claims in state courts under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933. Filings had dropped prior to the ruling, but Aganin predicted that cases in state courts would be “more likely” during the second half of this year.
Also unclear is the prevalence of shareholder class actions brought over initial coin offerings or other cryptocurrencies. In 2017, there were five such cases; so far this year, there were seven. But the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is considering potential regulation.
“The attractiveness of bringing a lawsuit related to underlying cryptocurrencies in federal court will depend to a large degree on what the SEC develops as its framework,” Aganin said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBankruptcy Filings Surged in First Half of 2024 Amid Uptick in Big Chapter 11 Cases
3 minute readTrump Financial Statements From 2011 to 2020 'Should No Longer Be Relied Upon,' Accountant's GC Says
Bonuses and Beyond: Law Firms Wrap Up Lucrative Year With Record-High Rewards
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250