AT&T Case 'Will Shape the Future,' DOJ Tells DC Circuit in Opening Brief
The U.S. Justice Department on Monday filed its opening brief in the D.C. Circuit. Here's a look at the Justice Department team fighting to revive its legal challenge to the AT&T-Time Warner merger.
August 01, 2018 at 01:05 PM
2 minute read
Updated on Aug. 6 at 3:50 p.m. Sidley Austin O'Melveny & Myers Monday filed its opening brief
"This appeal arises from the first vertical merger case the United States has needed to litigate to judgment in four decades, a fact that reflects the government's high standard for bringing such actions and the widespread harm this merger will cause. The outcome of this appeal will shape the future of the media and telecommunications industries for years to come by setting the standard for determining whether industry participants will be permitted to merge into vertically integrated firms that control valuable programming content as well as the means of distributing that content to consumers."
Makan Delrahim Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck Andrew Finch Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison on his financial disclosure Kristen Limarzi, King & Spalding briefs Adam D. Chandler op-ed former Rhodes scholar LinkedIn Mary Helen Wimberly expedite Hogan Lovells a case concerning brief Read more: Sidley Austin's Peter Keisler Steps Up for AT&T in Antitrust Appellate Battle DOJ Effort to Derail AT&T-Time Warner Merger Seen as Uphill Fight AT&T Judge Richard Leon Wasn't Mocking Trump! Exclamation Points Are His Mark! Antitrust Vet Richard Parker Leaves O'Melveny for Gibson Dunn Five Things Makan Delrahim Has Said About Antitrust Policy Trump Lawyers' Financial Disclosures Reveal Big Law Salaries, Client Lists
Update: This report was updated to include a link to the Justice Department's opening brief in the D.C. Circuit.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
After 2024's Regulatory Tsunami, Financial Services Firms Hope Storm Clouds Break
Solana Labs Co-Founder Allegedly Pocketed Ex-Wife’s ‘Millions of Dollars’ of Crypto Gains
4 minute read
Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Recent FTC Cases Against Auto Dealers Suggest Regulators Are Keeping Foot on Accelerator
- 2‘Not A Kindergarten Teacher’: Judge Blasts Keller Postman, Jenner & Block, in Mass Arb Dispute
- 3A&O Shearman, Hogan Lovells and the Stories That Shaped Africa This Year
- 4Borden Ladner Gervais Cyber Expert Warns of AI-Boosted Ransomware Attacks
- 5Phila. Judge Upholds $68.5M Verdict Over Construction Worker's Death
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
