Brett Kavanaugh's SCOTUS Confirmation Hearing Is Set for Sept. 4
The hearings on Kavanaugh's nomination will come less than a month before the start of the next Supreme Court term.
August 10, 2018 at 03:32 PM
3 minute read
Senate Judiciary Committee hearings on Judge Brett Kavanaugh's nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court are scheduled to start on Sept. 4, the committee said Friday.
The hearings on Kavanaugh's nomination will come just weeks before the start of the next term. The first conference day of the coming October term is Sept. 24, and the first day of oral argument is scheduled for Monday, Oct. 1.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has said that he wants to confirm Kavanaugh before the start of the October term. With hearings on Kavanaugh's nomination scheduled to begin in the first full week of September, that leaves fewer than 30 days between the opening of the hearings and the start of the coming term.
Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, the judiciary chairman, said he expects Kavanaugh's confirmation hearing to last up to four days. Kavanaugh is expected to face questioning on Sept. 5, the committee said. The committee hasn't announced a witness list, but said to expect “testimony by those who know Judge Kavanaugh the best, outside legal experts, and the American Bar Association.”
The September 4 start date would come 57 days after President Trump's announcement of Kavanaugh's nomination. The committee's announcement of the forthcoming hearings noted that the three most recently confirmed justices—Neil Gorsuch, Elena Kagan, and Sonia Sotomayor—had hearings 48 to 49 days after the president announced their respective nominations.
Senate Republicans action on the vacancy created by Justice Anthony Kennedy's departure means they aim to fill his seat less than three months after his July 31 retirement. The Senate's inaction on Judge Merrick Garland's nomination by President Barack Obama meant the late Justice Antonin Scalia's seat remained vacant until Gorsuch was confirmed—more than 400 days after the vacancy was created.
The 15 Supreme Court vacancies since 1970 before Kennedy's exit were filled within 55 days on average, according to the Pew Research Center. The longest gap between a vacancy and a replacement justice came in 1846, when Justice Robert C. Grier filled a slot that remained open for 841 days—or more than two years—after the death of Justice Henry Baldwin.
Read more:
Akhil Amar, Liberal Prof at Yale Law, Would Testify for Kavanaugh If Asked
Arnold & Porter's Lisa Blatt Steps Into Fray, Backing Kavanaugh Nomination
A Record Number of SCOTUS Clerks Are Likely This Term—Thanks to Kennedy
Kavanaugh's Clerk Hires: Inside the Diverse, Ivy-Heavy Group of 48
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRFK Jr. Will Keep Affiliations With Morgan & Morgan, Other Law Firms If Confirmed to DHHS
3 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute read3rd Circuit Nominee Mangi Sees 'No Pathway to Confirmation,' Derides 'Organized Smear Campaign'
4 minute readJudge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
Trending Stories
- 1Public Notices/Calendars
- 2Wednesday Newspaper
- 3Decision of the Day: Qui Tam Relators Do Not Plausibly Claim Firm Avoided Tax Obligations Through Visa Applications, Circuit Finds
- 4Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-116
- 5Big Law Firms Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250