Brett Kavanaugh's SCOTUS Confirmation Hearing Is Set for Sept. 4
The hearings on Kavanaugh's nomination will come less than a month before the start of the next Supreme Court term.
August 10, 2018 at 03:32 PM
3 minute read
Senate Judiciary Committee hearings on Judge Brett Kavanaugh's nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court are scheduled to start on Sept. 4, the committee said Friday.
The hearings on Kavanaugh's nomination will come just weeks before the start of the next term. The first conference day of the coming October term is Sept. 24, and the first day of oral argument is scheduled for Monday, Oct. 1.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has said that he wants to confirm Kavanaugh before the start of the October term. With hearings on Kavanaugh's nomination scheduled to begin in the first full week of September, that leaves fewer than 30 days between the opening of the hearings and the start of the coming term.
Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, the judiciary chairman, said he expects Kavanaugh's confirmation hearing to last up to four days. Kavanaugh is expected to face questioning on Sept. 5, the committee said. The committee hasn't announced a witness list, but said to expect “testimony by those who know Judge Kavanaugh the best, outside legal experts, and the American Bar Association.”
The September 4 start date would come 57 days after President Trump's announcement of Kavanaugh's nomination. The committee's announcement of the forthcoming hearings noted that the three most recently confirmed justices—Neil Gorsuch, Elena Kagan, and Sonia Sotomayor—had hearings 48 to 49 days after the president announced their respective nominations.
Senate Republicans action on the vacancy created by Justice Anthony Kennedy's departure means they aim to fill his seat less than three months after his July 31 retirement. The Senate's inaction on Judge Merrick Garland's nomination by President Barack Obama meant the late Justice Antonin Scalia's seat remained vacant until Gorsuch was confirmed—more than 400 days after the vacancy was created.
The 15 Supreme Court vacancies since 1970 before Kennedy's exit were filled within 55 days on average, according to the Pew Research Center. The longest gap between a vacancy and a replacement justice came in 1846, when Justice Robert C. Grier filled a slot that remained open for 841 days—or more than two years—after the death of Justice Henry Baldwin.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEx-Deputy AG Trusts U.S. Legal System To Pull Country Through Times of Duress
7 minute read'Even Playing Field?' Wiley Rein Intervenes in Federal Election Campaign Spending Row
3 minute readBig Law Lawyers Fan Out for Election Day Volunteering in Call Centers and Litigation
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Why Is It Becoming More Difficult for Businesses to Mandate Arbitration of Employment Disputes?
- 2The Whys and Hows of a Mediator’s Proposal
- 3Litigators of the Week: A Trade Secret Win at the ITC for Viking Over Promising Potential Liver Drug
- 4Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 5'The Show Must Go On': Solo-GC-of-Year Kevin Colby Pulls Off Perpetual Juggling Act
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250