2 Years Too Early, Kavanaugh Readied for Rehnquist's Departure From Court
Documents the Senate Judiciary Committee posted as part of Kavanaugh's nomination reveal a heightened-alert atmosphere inside and outside the White House surrounding the speculation that Supreme Court vacancies would soon open up.
August 13, 2018 at 03:13 PM
4 minute read
Rumors in June 2003 predicting Chief Justice William Rehnquist would soon retire from the U.S. Supreme Court were multiplying so fast that then-White House official Brett Kavanaugh circulated a draft statement wishing Rehnquist well.
“Chief Justice Rehnquist's vision, leadership and opinions have had an enormous and enduring impact on American life and American law” according to the statement Kavanaugh sent to another White House official.
The tribute turned out to be premature. Rehnquist stayed on the court until he died in September 2005. Rumors that Justice Sandra Day O'Connor would retire soon were also prevalent in 2003, but she retired in January 2006.
Documents released by the Senate Judiciary Committee on Sunday from the office of former President George W. Bush in advance of Kavanaugh's Supreme Court confirmation hearing next month reveal a heightened-alert atmosphere inside and outside the White House surrounding the speculation that Supreme Court vacancies would soon open up. In an earlier email, from 2001, Kavanaugh predicted—”for the archives”—that Rehnquist was retiring on a specific day at the end of that year's term.
The records released over the weekend show reporters peppered press secretary Ari Fleischer with questions about imminent departures, and Democratic Senate leaders demanded that they be consulted before any replacements were picked.
Bill Frist, then-Senate Majority leader, issued a memo spelling out the “fair and orderly process” that would be used to handle nominations. Speculation about who would replace the justices ranged from White House counsel Alberto Gonzales to Janice Rogers Brown, then a California state Supreme Court justice who would be appointed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
On June 20, 2003, just six days before the end of the Supreme Court term, Kavanaugh sent out an email, perhaps as a model for the Rehnquist statement, containing the text of what President George H.W. Bush said in 1991 when Justice Thurgood Marshall retired. Bush's statement extolled Marshall's “extraordinary and distinguished service to his country as a pioneering civil rights leader” among other achievements.
Responding to Kavanaugh, in what was likely an attempt at humor, then-deputy White House counsel David Leitch replied: “I guess we can insert the chief's name into this, right?”
Leitch also commented on Kavanaugh's draft farewell to Rehnquist, which was circulated on the morning of June 26, 2003, the final day of the court's term. The statement included this sentence: “As a jurist for more than 30 years, Chief Justice Rehnquist has faithfully interpreted the Constitution … to maintain the constitutional separation of powers.”
Leitch, himself a former Rehnquist clerk, told Kavanaugh by email: “I love the guy, but it's hard for me to think that the author of Morrison v. Olson should be praised” for maintaining separation of power. Leitch, who clerked for Rehnquist in 1986 and 1987, is now global general counsel to Bank of America Corp.
Morrison v. Olson, a 1988 decision, found that the appointment of independent counsels by the attorney general under the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 was constitutional. The provision of the law that authorized independent counsels expired in 1999, but the controversial ruling has continuing importance. In a decision issued Monday, a federal district court judge cited the Morrison case as she upheld the appointment of Robert Mueller as special counsel to probe Russian interference in the 2016 election.
Kavanaugh, who clerked at the Supreme Court while Rehnquist was chief justice, once described Rehnquist as his “judicial hero.”
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPaul Weiss’ Shanmugam Joins 11th Circuit Fight Over False Claims Act’s Constitutionality
‘A Force of Nature’: Littler Mendelson Shareholder Michael Lotito Dies At 76
3 minute readUS Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
'Unlawful Release'?: Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 2Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 3'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 4Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
- 5As a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250