'Unauthorized' Removal in Asylum Case Draws Judge's Ire, Sparks Procedure Review
“While we were in the air, no one told me anything about what was happening. It was not until we landed in my home country that an official asked me my name and whether I was appealing my case," the plaintiff recounted in a declaration filed Monday.
August 13, 2018 at 07:57 PM
4 minute read
U.S. immigration officials are reviewing the “confusion” that led to the “unauthorized” deportation of a mother and her daughter to El Salvador last week as their lawyers fought in Washington to freeze any removals pending the outcome of their court challenge.
U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan of the District of Columbia on Aug. 9 lambasted the government for allowing the woman, identified in court papers by the pseudonym Carmen, to be removed despite government lawyers' contrary representations in court. Sullivan said the government “spirited away” the mother and her daughter, and he ordered the U.S. to “turn that plane around.” The judge called the government conduct “outrageous.”
The Justice Department, responding to a court order, on Monday filed a report detailing the events that led up to the removal of Carmen and her daughter, and the scramble to get the family back to the United States. The government said Carmen and her daughter never got off the plane in El Salvador. The family is now in U.S. custody at a family center in Texas.
Justice Department lawyer Erez Reuveni, a senior immigration lawyer, said federal immigration officials are reviewing “removal procedures in the San Antonio Field Office to identify gaps in oversight of the removal process.” Reuveni also reported that “protocols have been updated to reflect that transfer and/or removal of any alien with a stay of removal, hold on removal, or any other management-directed impediment to removal will require” further supervisory approvals.
A U.S. deportation officer, according to the court filing Monday, “appears to have gone through normal procedures, overlooked the impediment to removal at issue here because it was not in the system to be seen, and continued with removal procedures without verifying the information with a supervisor.”
Justice Department lawyers had previously told the court that the government would not remove any of the plaintiffs in the case, including Carmen and her daughter, before 11:59 p.m. Aug. 10. Sullivan learned at a court hearing Aug. 9 that the girl and her mother had been removed, despite representations to the contrary.
According to Reuveni's report, the DOJ itself only learned of Carmen's deportation during a break in the hearing. Lawyers caught wind of her possible removal from counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union, which has been representing Carmen and her daughter.
“Until that time, no one at ICE or DHS had informed undersigned counsel or any DOJ counsel under my supervision of any actions taken on the ground in San Antonio inconsistent with undersigned counsel's representation to this court, nor of any plans to execute plaintiffs' expedited removal orders,” Reuveni wrote.
Sullivan threatened to initiate contempt proceedings against U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions and other officials for any noncompliance with his directive to return Carmen and her daughter.
In a declaration to the court, Carmen said her removal from the country occurred the morning of Aug. 9, after officials at her immigration detention center in Texas “unexpectedly” awoke her. Hours later, Carmen and her daughter were “hurried” onto a San Antonio plane, she said.
“While we were in the air, no one told me anything about what was happening. It was not until we landed in my home country that an official asked me my name and whether I was appealing my case. I said my name, and told him that I was appealing my case,” Carmen said in the court filing. “The official told me that his boss had told him that I was going to be returned to the U.S.”
The developments are part of the ACLU's legal challenge to the Trump administration's new asylum policy, which no longer accepts fear of gang violence or domestic abuse as a basis for receiving asylum in the U.S. The ACLU in Washington's federal trial court sued the government last week, representing about a dozen women and children, including Carmen and her daughter, in the case.
The Justice Department's report Monday to the court is posted below:
Read more:
'Turn That Plane Around' and Other Times Judge Emmet Sullivan Was Outraged
DOJ Apologizes for 'Oversight' on Trump Hotel Records Fight
After Disclosure Failure, DC Judge Wants List of Trump Voter Commission Docs
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSEC Official Hints at More Restraint With Industry Bars, Less With Wells Meetings
4 minute readSidley Adds Ex-DOJ Criminal Division Deputy Leader, Paul Hastings Adds REIT Partner, in Latest DC Hiring
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Ex-Kline & Specter Associate Drops Lawsuit Against the Firm
- 2Am Law 100 Lateral Partner Hiring Rose in 2024: Report
- 3The Importance of Federal Rule of Evidence 502 and Its Impact on Privilege
- 4What’s at Stake in Supreme Court Case Over Religious Charter School?
- 5People in the News—Jan. 30, 2025—Rubin Glickman, Goldberg Segalla
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250