Closings Set for Wednesday After Manafort Declines to Testify at Fraud Trial
Manafort's defense rested its case without calling any witnesses in the trial.
August 14, 2018 at 12:45 PM
2 minute read
Prosecutors and defense attorneys will make their closing arguments Wednesday morning in the tax and bank fraud trial of Paul Manafort in Virginia federal court.
U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis III of the Eastern District of Virginia told lawyers in the courtroom, while jurors were not present, to try to reduce their closing arguments to one-and-a-half hours, rather than two hours. While Manafort's defense lawyers said they were fine with that, prosecutor Greg Andres said the United States requires time to map out the extensive case it's built.
The announcement of closing arguments came after Manafort's lead defense attorney, Kevin Downing, told the judge shortly before noon on Tuesday, “The defense rests, your honor.” Manafort's lawyers did not call any witnesses, whereas prosecutors called more than two dozen over 10 days.
For the first time in the trial, Manafort also spoke at the courtroom podium. “You have an absolute right to testify before this jury. You also have an absolute right to remain silent,” Ellis told Manafort. After a couple of questions, he asked Manafort if he wished to testify.
“No, sir,” Manafort replied.
The judge also said Tuesday that he would resolve an issue over a judicial notice, and hold an instructions conference on Tuesday, before Wednesday's proceeding. Earlier in the morning, he rejected the Manafort legal team's bid to stop the trial from moving to jurors.
The swift end came with some surprise Tuesday, and characteristic courtroom humor that's been on display during the trial.
Multiple reporters sprinted out of the courtroom after Downing rested the case.
“Does anyone else need to leave the room?” Ellis asked the court. After a few more people left, he added: “The answer was yes.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
Auditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
4 minute readTexas Court Invalidates SEC’s Dealer Rule, Siding with Crypto Advocates
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Chief Assistant District Attorney and Litigator Shortlisted for Paulding County Judgeship
- 2'America's Next Top Model' Contestant Says Ye Assaulted Her
- 3LexisNexis Responds to Canadian Professor’s Criticism of Lexis+ AI
- 4'Everything Leaves a Digital Footprint': How to Navigate the Complexities of Internal Investigations
- 5Baker McKenzie Accepts Defeat on Australian Integration With Firm's Asia Practice
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250