PTAB Chief Judge Taking New Role at USPTO
David Ruschke will become a senior adviser, giving PTO Director Andrei Iancu the opportunity to name his own chief of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
August 15, 2018 at 11:01 PM
4 minute read
Chief Judge David Ruschke of the Patent and Trial Appeal Board
The chief judge of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board is taking a new role within the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, the agency has confirmed.
David Ruschke “has graciously accepted the position of Senior Advisor to Patents,” PTO Director Andrei Iancu said in a statement Wednesday. Effective Sept. 2, The new position will serve as a bridge between the PTAB and the patent examination side of the PTO. “I look forward to working with David to improve intra-agency cooperation,” Iancu said in the statement.
The move gives Iancu the opportunity to place his own person at the top of a division that's been a lightning rod in the patent world. Formerly the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, the PTAB was reorganized by the America Invents Act into a streamlined forum for challenging patent validity. The PTAB has been popular with companies sued for patent infringement but came under attack almost immediately from patent owners and others for being too aggressive in weeding out invalid patent claims.
Former Federal Circuit Chief Judge Randall Rader dubbed it a “death squad” for patent rights and bills that would defang the board have been regularly introduced in Congress. At a hearing before the U.S. Supreme Court last November, Chief Justice John Roberts questioned whether Ruschke should even be called a “judge.”
Ruschke was a longtime Medtronic IP attorney who took over from Acting Chief Judge Nathan Kelley in 2016. Under his leadership, the “kill rate” in AIA proceedings has dropped, and Ruschke personally signed onto an opinion last fall that clamped down on serial petitions, settling a major complaint among patent owners.
The perception in some segments of the bar is that may not have been enough for Iancu, a former Irell & Manella partner who has promised to strike a balance at the PTO that promotes innovation.
Ruschke “had the hardest job in patent law,” said Jonathan Stroud, chief IP counsel of Unified Patents. “He was in the middle of a lot of different interests, and he managed to do an honorable job, maintaining his integrity.”
➤➤ Get IP news and commentary straight to your inbox with Skilled in the Art by Scott Graham. Sign up here.
Latham & Watkins partner Bob Steinberg, a co-founder of the PTAB Bar Association, credited Ruschke with the outreach that was needed to get the bar group up and running. “I thought he did a great job,” Steinberg said.
Others noted that Ruschke revealed in a suit against his former employer, Medtronic, that he has a chronic heart condition, and that the job of PTAB chief judge is demanding, with much cross-country travel required.
Ruschke did not respond to an email seeking comment.
PTAB veterans Scott Boalick and Jacqueline Wright Bonilla will serve as acting chief judge and acting deputy chief, respectively.
Ruschke is the second high-profile member of PTO leadership to take a new position this summer. Kelley, the PTO's solicitor, left the agency a few weeks ago, saying it was time to try something new. The agency's former acting director, Joseph Matal, is serving as acting solicitor in the interim.
Iancu's announcement said that Ruschke's new position will help coordinate between PTAB and the Office of the Commissioner for Patents. It doesn't offer many more specifics, though former PTAB member Neil Smith speculated that Ruschke could get involved in new procedures for amending patent claims during AIA proceedings.
Smith notes that on an outreach tour this summer, the PTAB began requesting feedback on whether patent examiners should get involved in the claim amendment process. “It seemed like an unusual and difficult-to-implement process,” Smith said, but it might be a window into what the PTO is thinking with Ruschke's new position.
Correction: This story has been updated to correct Jonathan Stroud's title.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFTC Sues PepsiCo for Alleged Price Break to Big-Box Retailer, Incurs Holyoak's Wrath
5 minute readSupreme Court Will Hear Religious Parents' Bid to Opt Out of LGBTQ-Themed School Books
Wells Fargo and Bank of America Agree to Pay Combined $60 Million to Settle SEC Probe
Trending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250