Trump's 8th Circuit Pick Repudiates Nebraska Judge's Controversial Tweet
"I think it's well established that sexual harassment occurs in a variety of places. I would support efforts to address those issues aggressively," 8th Circuit nominee Jonathan Kobes said Wednesday, distancing himself from a judge's controversial remarks about a working group confronting sexual harassment in the judiciary.
August 22, 2018 at 03:33 PM
5 minute read
President Donald Trump's nominee to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit on Wednesday repudiated comments by a senior district judge in that circuit who criticized a group of former law clerks who are advocating for steps to address sexual harassment in the judiciary.
During a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on six nominations, Sen. Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, put nominee Jonathan Kobes on the spot by asking him if he agreed with comments by U.S. District Judge Richard Kopf of the District of Nebraska.
Kopf in July tweeted: “[All female] Law Clerks for Workplace Accountability launches a website, a Twitter account, and issues its 'Response to the Judiciary Workplace Accountability Working Group's Report.' A new Spanish Inquisition by SJWs? Thanks goodness for Article III.”
Hirono asked Kobes, general counsel to U.S. Sen. Michael Rounds, R-South Dakota, if he agreed with Kopf.
“I have not read those comments,” Kobes began, but Hirono interjected, “I just read them to you. Do you agree with them?”
Kobes responded: “I do not. I think it's well established that sexual harassment occurs in a variety of places. I would support efforts to address those issues aggressively. Those are not words I would ever use in a personal or professional context.”
Proposed reforms in the federal judiciary—spurred by the resignation of disgraced Judge Alex Kozinski of the Ninth Circuit—address “power disparities” in the courts. Circuit courts around the country are taking steps to implement proposals to protect employees from workplace harassment and make it easier to report harassment.
Kobes received the most extensive questioning of the six nominees who appeared Wednesday in the Senate. Some Democrats, including Sen. Richard Durbin of Illinois, used the hearing to vent frustration over their stymied access to U.S. Supreme Court justice nominee Brett Kavanaugh's records as staff secretary to former President George W. Bush.
Hirono, referring to recent court actions involving Michael Cohen and Paul Manafort, announced she was canceling a meeting with Kavanaugh. Cohen, a former Trump lawyer, pleaded guilty Tuesday in a hush-money scheme in which he implicated the president. Manafort, the former Trump campaign chairman, was found guilty Tuesday on bank and tax fraud charges in Virginia federal court.
“This president, who is an unindicted co-conspirator in a criminal matter, does not deserve the courtesy of a meeting with his nominee—purposely selected to protect, as we say in Hawaii, his own okole,” Hirono said.
Appearing with Kobes were five trial court nominees, including U.S. Magistrate Judge Mary Rowland, named to a seat on the district court in Chicago. The former civil rights litigator is the Trump administration's first LGBT judicial nominee. In introducing her family and friends who attended the hearing, Rowland gave a shoutout to federal public defenders “who do tough, important work all over the country.”
Sen. John Kennedy, R-Louisiana, asked Rowland what U.S. Supreme Court decision other than Brown v. Board of Education and Roe v. Wade had the greatest impact on American society. Rowland pointed to Marbury v. Madison because, she said, “it established the pre-eminence of the court and it was early on when the founding documents were signed. At that point, it was important to establish that principle.”
Kobes and Kenneth Bell, tapped for the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina and currently partner at McGuireWoods in Charlotte, North Carolina, were questioned about earlier positions and writings reflecting hostility towards abortion. Both men promised to faithfully apply Supreme Court precedent.
Two former clerks to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas also appeared Wednesday for their confirmation hearings: Carl Nichols, vice chair of the government and regulatory litigation team at Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr in Washington, nominated to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, and Martha Pacold, deputy general counsel to the U.S. Treasury Department, who was picked for the district court in the Northern District of Illinois.
The committee also heard from Steven Seeger, senior trial counsel at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in Chicago, also nominated to the district court for the Northern District of Illinois.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHolland & Knight, Akin, Crowell, Barnes and Day Pitney Add to DC Practices
3 minute read'There Is No Time to Waste': Matt Gaetz Withdraws From AG Nomination
3 minute readRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250