Prosecutors Accuse Lawyer for Alleged Russian Spy of Blabbing to the Press
Prosecutors claim Maria Butina's attorney has repeatedly spoken to the press about the case despite a warning from the court during last month's hearing.
August 23, 2018 at 03:40 PM
3 minute read
Federal prosecutors have accused the attorney representing alleged Russian spy Maria Butina of flouting local rules and ignoring court warnings by speaking to the press.
Local criminal rules prohibit lawyers in a case from speaking publicly about it, since those statements could interfere with a fair trial or prejudice jurors. Lawyers are also restricted from making any “extrajudicial statement” that might reveal a witness' identity or from discussing evidence in the case.
“Despite this clear prohibition, the government has encountered multiple recent instances of you in the press commenting about the merits and evidence of this case,” prosecutors at the U.S. Attorney's Office in Washington, D.C., wrote to Butina's lawyer, Robert Driscoll of McGlinchey Stafford.
In the letter, they cite a number of statements Driscoll made to news outlets in the last month. In one July 28 article for Politico, he confirmed the identity of a Russian individual that Butina had dined with, but “downplayed” the event.
Prosecutors say Driscoll's comments to the media were also “made in disregard of a recent warning” by U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan of the District of Columbia during a status hearing last month. At the time, the judge said she would hold off on issuing a gag order, but cautioned Driscoll—a frequent TV commentator—from running to the press. “Do you think it's in your client's interest to have her case tried in the press?” she asked at the time.
“Your comments in the press since that hearing appear to have been made without any regard to the court's admonition,” reads the letter from prosecutors Thursday.
Prosecutors have charged Butina with conspiring against the U.S. as an undisclosed Russian agent. They say the 29-year-old has been living and working in the country—infiltrating Republican political circles—at the direction of a high-ranking Russian official.
Butina is currently being held in an Alexandria jail after federal Magistrate Judge Deborah Robinson ordered her detained as she awaits trial.
Read the letter:
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Health Care Behemoth'?: DOJ Seeks Injunction Blocking $3.3B UnitedHealth Merger Proposal
3 minute readNLRB Bans 'Captive Audience' Meetings, Yanking Away Platform Employers Used to Combat Unionizing
Freshfields Hires DOJ Official, Squire Taps Paul Hastings Atty for US Antitrust Head
3 minute readHow Big Law Congressional Investigation Practices Will Stay Busy in 2025
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250