How Lawyers Made Trump's Horrible Week Even Worse
It was the attorneys in the president's orbit who ultimately caused the most trouble for him, and deepened his legal and political woes in the wake of Paul Manafort's conviction in Virginia.
August 24, 2018 at 03:15 PM
5 minute read
It has been, by all accounts, a nightmarish week for the president, and the lawyers surrounding President Donald Trump have done little to make things better in the wake of Paul Manafort's conviction.
The president—who once bemoaned “Where's my Roy Cohn”—prizes loyalty in his lawyers. But this week, it was the attorneys in Trump's orbit who ultimately caused the most trouble for him, and deepened his legal and political woes.
Here's a look back at what happened:
➤ The first development to stun the Trump world was the revelation, reported by The New York Times, that White House counsel Donald McGahn has spoken extensively with the special counsel about whether Trump obstructed justice while in office. It's said that McGahn participated in “at least three voluntary interviews,” about 30 hours' worth over the span of nine months.
“So this is a very big deal,” Carrie Cordero, former counsel to the assistant attorney general of the National Security Division, tweeted. Former President Barack Obama-era White House counsel Bob Bauer put it like this over at The Washington Post: “It is hard to imagine that they took much comfort in learning of the extent of [Robert] Mueller's interest in what the White House counsel had to say.”
➤➤ Keep up with Trump's legal team and the latest maneuvers in the Mueller investigation. Sign up for Trump Watch by Ellis Kim.
McGahn has witnessed, of course, the behind-the-scenes of several episodes that might be of interest to Mueller, including Trump's firing of former FBI director James Comey, and the near-dismissals of the special counsel.
“I have long believed that Mueller will conclude that Trump obstructed justice, but I did so based on press reports. Mueller can't rely on news reports—he needs eyewitnesses. It wasn't a guarantee that he would have a strong eyewitness to Trump's obstructive acts. Now he does,” Renato Mariotti, a Thompson Coburn partner and former federal prosecutor, tweeted.
➤ The biggest development of the week, and by far the largest legal headache for the president: Michael Cohen, his former personal attorney and fixer, pleaded guilty to a number of felonies, and told a Manhattan federal judge under oath that a candidate—Trump's name wasn't mentioned in court—directed him to facilitate hush payments to two women (Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal) with whom Trump has allegedly had affairs. This was done for the “principal purpose of influencing the election,” Cohen said.
➤ U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions has often found himself at the receiving end of the president's many barbs and broadsides. On Thursday, he punched back. It came after Trump attacked Sessions in a Fox News interview, saying Sessions “never took control” of the Justice Department. And that's when the country's top law enforcement officer responded: “While I am attorney general, the actions of the Department of Justice will not be improperly influenced by political considerations,” Sessions said in a statement.
The Trump-Sessions contretemps of course followed some pretty severe legal blows that prosecutors landed against two of the president's former top dogs. But the dustup also came at a remarkable moment Tuesday morning when senators began signalling that Sessions could be nearing the end of his time at the DOJ. Sen. Chuck Grassley, who chairs the Judiciary Committee, and Sen. Lindsey Graham both hinted to reporters that Trump might move to replace his attorney general after the 2018 midterm elections. Whoever replaces Sessions, who is recused from Mueller's probe into Russia interference in the presidential election, could ultimately affect that work.
“Jeff, this is GREAT, what everyone wants,” Trump tweeted in a response Friday morning, “so look into all of the corruption on the 'other side' including deleted Emails, Comey lies & leaks, Mueller conflicts, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Ohr……”
He continued, “Come on Jeff, you can do it, the country is waiting!”
➤ The president's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani trotted out the line, “Truth isn't truth” in an interview on NBC's “Meet the Press” last Sunday. That phrase came in an exchange with host Chuck Todd over whether Trump should sit for an interview with Mueller. When Giuliani insisted that such an interview would be a perjury trap, Todd replied that truth was truth. That prompted Giuliani's phrase: “No, it isn't truth. Truth isn't truth.” The line, while not immediately damaging for the president, was an unforced error that quickly lit up social media.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAfter Regime Change, Syria Remains Liable in US Federal Courts for Alleged Assad-Era Terrorism Support
3 minute readSplit 4th Circuit Ruling Is a Win for Covington & Burling in US Army Base Attack Litigation
3 minute readA Conversation with NLJ Lifetime Achievement Award Winner Jeff Smith
11 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250