Veteran Supreme Court Advocates Voice Support for Nominee Brett Kavanaugh
The letter from 41 leading U.S. Supreme Court advocates comes eight days before Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation hearing is set to begin on Sept. 4 and amid protests against the Trump administration's nominee.
August 27, 2018 at 12:37 PM
5 minute read
Updated Aug. 28 at 12:01 p.m.
Forty-one veteran appellate advocates joined in a letter sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Monday expressing “strong support” for U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.
“Based on our experience with Judge Kavanaugh and his work over 12 years of distinguished judicial service,” the letter stated, “we are confident that he possesses the character, temperament and intellect that will make him an asset to our nation's highest court.”
The letter came eight days before Kavanaugh's hearing begins on Sept. 4. Over the weekend, demonstrators in several cities protested Kavanaugh's nomination.
The letter from the lawyers asserted that “Kavanaugh has a well-deserved reputation as an outstanding jurist. His opinions are clear, rigorous, and thoughtful. Those of us who have appeared before him appreciate his impressive ability to distill complex legal issues to their essence, the incisiveness of his questions, and the unfailing courtesy he extends to his colleagues and to counsel who appear before him.”
The signers described themselves as holding “a broad range of political, policy, and jurisprudential views, but we speak as one in supporting Judge Kavanaugh's nomination.”
Arnold & Porter partner Lisa Blatt was an organizer of the letter-writing effort. On Aug. 2, Politico published a column by Blatt titled “I'm a Liberal Feminist Lawyer. Here's Why Democrats Should Support Judge Kavanaugh.”
But apart from Blatt, many of the lawyers who signed are former clerks to Republican-appointed justices or solicitors general appointed by Republican presidents. Former solicitors general Paul Clement, Gregory Garre and Theodore Olson, all Republican appointees, are on the letter. Seth Waxman, Neal Katyal and Donald Verrilli Jr., appointed by Democratic presidents, were not on the list and did not respond to queries as to whether they were invited to sign.
Along with Olson as a signer, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher is heavily represented in the letter by Miguel Estrada, Thomas Dupree Jr., Allyson Ho, Matthew McGill, Mark Perry, Amir Tayrani and Helgi Walker. Estrada was an organizer of the letter-writing effort, along with Blatt.
Other advocates who signed on include Michael Carvin, Shay Dvoretsky and Glen Nager of Jones Day, Erin Murphy of Kirkland & Ellis, Christopher Landau of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan; William Jay of Goodwin Procter, William Consovoy of Consovoy McCarthy Park, Roman Martinez of Latham & Watkins, Carter Phillips and Peter Keisler of Sidley Austin, Deanne Maynard of Morrison & Foerster, Dan Himmelfarb of Mayer Brown, Michael Kellogg and Aaron Panner of Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, and Benjamin Horwich of Munger, Tolles & Olson.
The roster signing the Kavanaugh letter closely mirrors a similar letter written last year in support of nominee Neil Gorsuch.
Roy Englert Jr. of Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck, Untereiner & Sauber, one of the lawyers who signed the Gorsuch letter but not the Kavanaugh letter, said Monday that he had worked closely with Gorsuch on a judicial rules committee for six years, but had less experience with Kavanaugh.
“I have an extremely high opinion of Judge Kavanaugh, but I have never appeared before him other than at the Shakespeare Theatre, and we never collaborated on anything of substance, before or after he became a judge,” Englert said.
John Elwood of Vinson & Elkins, who also signed the Gorsuch letter but not the Kavanaugh letter, explained that he served on an American Bar Association reading committee that reviewed Kavanaugh's opinions and other writings. “Since I was asked to join that group, I've refrained from making public statements about the judge,” Elwood said.
For the nomination of Elena Kagan in 2010, letters were sent by different categories of lawyers—such as former assistants and deputies to the solicitor general's office, and former Supreme Court law clerks. In 2009, a group of lawyers significantly different from the Kavanaugh and Gorsuch letter-writers supported nominee Sonia Sotomayor. At least two prominent Supreme Court advocates endorsed all four nominees: Morrison & Foerster's Maynard, and Sidley Austin's Phillips.
The letter from the advocates is posted in full below:
Read more:
Update: An earlier version of this report misidentified Christopher Landau's firm. He is now a partner at Quinn Emanuel, not Kirkland & Ellis. Additionally, Glen Nager is a partner at Jones Day, not Mayer Brown.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhen Police Destroy Property, Is It a 'Taking'? Maybe So, Say Sotomayor, Gorsuch
Justices Seek Solicitor General's Views on Music Industry's Copyright Case Against ISP
SEC Obtained Record $8.2 Billion in Financial Remedies for Fiscal Year 2024, Commission Says
SEC Targets Rising Crypto Financier in $115 Million Securities Fraud
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250