Manafort Wants to Move His DC Trial to Roanoke, Virginia
Manafort's defense pointed to the intense media coverage of the former Trump campaign chairman's case in asking for a new venue outside of Washington, D.C.
August 29, 2018 at 10:59 AM
4 minute read
Defense lawyers for Paul Manafort are asking a federal judge to transfer his Washington, D.C. trial to Roanoke, Virginia, with a few weeks to go before the September trial kicks off.
Manafort's attorneys requested the change of venue in a motion filed Wednesday morning with U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in Washington, D.C., citing pretrial publicity—namely, “unrelenting news coverage” of Manafort—as a reason for the request.
“Mr. Manafort's legal issues and the attendant daily media coverage have become theatre in the continuing controversy surrounding President Donald Trump and his election,” the filing read. “This controversy continues to engender strong partisans on all sides of every issue. As a result, it is difficult, if not impossible, to divorce the issues in this case from the political views of potential jurors.”
The media attention is “most intense in and around Washington, D.C.,” they added.
The lawyers also pointed to the strong liberal leanings of D.C. to argue in favor of transferring Manafort's trial to Roanoke. In Washington, D.C., 91 percent of voters went for Hillary Clinton, the Democratic nominee, in the 2016 presidential election, while only around 4 percent voted for Trump.
About 57 percent of voters in the city of Roanoke broke in favor of Clinton, with nearly 38 percent going for Trump, according to the Associated Press. The rest of Roanoke County, as well as most of the counties in the Western District, went for Trump.
“This split is more balanced in other places such as Roanoke, Virginia, located in the Western District of Virginia,” Manafort's legal team wrote.
Manafort, the first individual to force special counsel Robert Mueller III's prosecutors to go to trial, is fighting charges in the District that he conspired to launder money, tampered with witnesses and failed to disclose his past foreign lobbying work in Ukraine.
A federal jury in Alexandria, Virginia, last week found the former Trump campaign chairman guilty of eight tax and bank fraud counts, including failing to disclose foreign bank accounts for one year.
Richard Westling, one of Manafort's attorneys, previewed the motion to move the location of the trial during a court hearing on Tuesday. Although the judge indicated she would not prejudge any filing, she initially appeared skeptical of the request. She noted that the publicity was nationwide, not just limited to the nation's capital.
“Where do you want to go?” Jackson asked Westling.
“I don't know if I have an answer to that, judge,” Westling said.
Before Manafort's trial in Alexandria, located in the Eastern District of Virginia, went underway, his legal team also made a push to transfer the matter to Roanoke. Judge T.S. Ellis III, who oversaw the trial last month, denied that motion.
The trial in Washington, D.C., should it proceed, is set to begin with jury selection on Sept.17. Lawyers will deliver opening arguments a week later, on Sept. 24.
Read the document:
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPaul Weiss’ Shanmugam Joins 11th Circuit Fight Over False Claims Act’s Constitutionality
‘A Force of Nature’: Littler Mendelson Shareholder Michael Lotito Dies At 76
3 minute readUS Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
'Unlawful Release'?: Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 2For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 3As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
- 4General Warrants and ESI
- 5GC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250