Charge Against DC Lobbyist Boosts Focus on Foreign-Agent Registration
Federal prosecutors in Washington, under the leadership of U.S. Attorney Jessie Liu, filed a one-count information against Sam Patten accusing him of failing to register under the Foreign-Agent Registration Act.
August 31, 2018 at 11:23 AM
4 minute read
Sam Patten, a Washington lobbyist and political consultant, was charged Friday with failing to register as a foreign agent related to his consulting work for a Ukrainian political party, marking the latest enforcement action flowing from the special counsel's scrutiny of advocacy for international clients.
Patten, reportedly formerly associated with Paul Manafort, the onetime Trump campaign chairman, was set to appear Friday in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Federal prosecutors in Washington, under the leadership of U.S. Attorney Jessie Liu, filed a one-count information against Patten accusing him of failing to register under the Foreign Agent Registration Act.
The case against Patten was reportedly referred to the U.S. Attorney's Office from Robert Mueller III, the special counsel leading the investigation of Russia's interference in the 2016 election.
Between 2014 and this year, Patten sought to influence U.S. policy on behalf of Ukraine's Opposition Bloc without disclosing his work to the Justice Department, according to the papers filed Friday.
Prosecutors alleged that Patten tried to arrange for his Russian business partner and a member of the Opposition Bloc—identified in court papers as a “prominent Ukrainian oligarch”—to meet with members of Congress and their staffs. Patten, prosecutors said, focused his efforts on members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and House Committee on Foreign Affairs but also worked to set up meetings with State Department officials and reporters.
Patten's business partner, described as a “Russian national,” and Ukrainian client are not identified in the court papers.
“The activity was undertaken to promote the interests of [the Ukrainian oligarch] and the Opposition Bloc to influence U.S. policy,” prosecutors said in the charging documents. Prosecutors also alleged that Patten helped the Ukrainian oligarch draft op-eds targeted at the U.S. press.
It was not immediately known whether Patten was represented by counsel. His plea hearing is set for 11 a.m. in front of U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson.
Jackson in late September will preside over the prosecution of Manafort on charges he also violated the Foreign Agents Registration Act for certain lobbying work for Ukraine. Manafort, separately, was found guilty at trial this month in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in Alexandria on bank and tax fraud charges.
The cases against Manafort, brought by Mueller, put a new spotlight on foreign-agent lobbying registration. New registrations under that law have reportedly ticked up since Manafort was first charged in 2017.
“While recent cases related to the special counsel's investigation are notable examples, the Department of Justice also has initiated broad criminal inquiries into myriad other firms and individuals, including persons already registered under the statute,” a team from Covington & Burling wrote recently in an advisory memo.
The Justice Department recently started posting more FARA-related documents, including letters discussing when and why a particular law or lobby shop should or should not register under the decades-old law.
The information is posted below:
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEx-Deputy AG Trusts U.S. Legal System To Pull Country Through Times of Duress
7 minute read'Even Playing Field?' Wiley Rein Intervenes in Federal Election Campaign Spending Row
3 minute readBig Law Lawyers Fan Out for Election Day Volunteering in Call Centers and Litigation
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'The Show Must Go On': Solo-GC-of-Year Kevin Colby Pulls Off Perpetual Juggling Act
- 2Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Match Group's Katie Dugan & Herrick's Carol Goodman
- 3Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Eric Wall, Executive VP, Syllo
- 4Battle for Top Talent Accelerates Amid Profit and Demand Surge
- 5Friday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250