Pandemonium in the Hearing Room: Protests, Complaints Mar Start of Kavanaugh SCOTUS Hearing
Protesters have called the nominee an “enemy of women's rights” and “a threat to this democracy” during the opening hours of Tuesday's hearing.
September 04, 2018 at 12:08 PM
4 minute read
Shouting protesters and sharp exchanges between senators dominated the opening hours of the confirmation hearing for U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.
Protesters rained down cries and accusations from the back of the hearing room Tuesday calling Kavanaugh an “enemy of women's rights” and “a threat to this democracy.” The nominee, a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, largely ignored the disruptions behind him, staring ahead at the senators before him.
The protests came as Democratic senators spent much of the first day of Kavanaugh's confirmation hearing urging Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, to adjourn until they had time to review documents from Kavanaugh's career, particularly from his time working in former President George W. Bush's White House. Grassley declined to do so, pressing forward with the contentious and at times chaotic hearing.
The committee received over 40,000 pages of documents Monday night from Bill Burck, a lawyer for the former president Bush, to the ire of Democrats who complain that they haven't had time to consider those records.
The senators are also demanding the production of more documents that the White House and Justice Department have withheld, citing executive privilege. Sen. Cory Booker, D-New Jersey, complained on Tuesday morning that committee members have only had access to around 10 percent of the body of work from Kavanaugh's career. “Just common sense says we should have access to thoroughly evaluate this person,” he said.
As senators spoke, protests frequently erupted in the back of the room.
“This should be an impeachment hearing,” yelled one protester as she was dragged out.
“This is a mockery and a travesty of justice,” cried another.
“You must vote no! You must vote no!” shouted one woman.
One male protester was physically pulled from the room by Capitol Hill officers, as Grassley defended the transparency of Kavanaugh's nomination.
Kavanaugh arrived Tuesday morning to a packed committee room, where his wife and two daughters sat behind him. White House Counsel Donald McGahn, a top aide for Kavanaugh's nomination, was seated in the front row. Former clerks who have publicly advocated in favor of Kavanaugh's nomination also peppered the audience, including Zina Bash, who is part of Kavanaugh's confirmation team and was seated next to McGahn, and Travis Lenkner, a managing partner at Keller Lenkner.
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein had a front-row seat for part of Tuesday's hearing. He exchanged handshakes with senators, including Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Arizona.
The heads of various legal and civil rights organizations opposing Kavanaugh's nomination also attended Tuesday: Sherrilyn Ifill of the NAACP's Legal Defense Fund, Vanita Gupta of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, and Fatima Goss Graves of the National Women's Law Center.
Meanwhile, protesters lined themselves outside the confirmation hearing room as well on Tuesday. A group of women, dressed in red robes, silently stood steps away from the Senate Judiciary room, a reference to the dystopian novel and television series, “The Handmaid's Tale.”
Read more:
What Should the Senate #AskKavanaugh? Here's What You Told Us
Trump Attorneys Claim Political Bias in Effort to Dismiss Trump Foundation Lawsuit
Big Law Stars Will Laud Kavanaugh, as Parkland Survivor & Nixon Whistleblower Raise Doubt
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Something Else Is Coming': DOGE Established, but With Limited Scope
Supreme Court Considers Reviving Lawsuit Over Fatal Traffic Stop Shooting
US DOJ Threatens to Prosecute Local Officials Who Don't Aid Immigration Enforcement
3 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Whether to Choose State or Federal Court in a Case Involving a Franchise?
- 2Am Law 200 Firms Announce Wave of D.C. Hires in White-Collar, Antitrust, Litigation Practices
- 3K&L Gates Files String of Suits Against Electronics Manufacturer's Competitors, Brightness Misrepresentations
- 4'Better of the Split': District Judge Weighs Circuit Divide in Considering Who Pays Decades-Old Medical Bill
- 5Which Georgia Courts Are Closed Today?—Here's a List
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250