Not Quite 'Just Say No,' but SEC Warns of Risk in Marijuana Investing
“If you are considering investing in a company with operations relating to the marijuana business industry, understand that the company may be criminally prosecuted and this may impact the value of your investment,” the SEC said in a new advisory Wednesday.
September 05, 2018 at 03:50 PM
4 minute read
Seizing on the latest enforcement action involving the booming marijuana industry, federal securities regulators sent a broad warning Wednesday about the dangers of investing in an industry that faces an ever-present risk of criminal prosecution under Trump administration policies.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, announcing charges against a Texas-based investment fund and its founder, issued an alert that cited the Trump administration's revocation of Obama-era guidance that largely said enforcers would keep their hands off cannabis companies operating legally under state law.
The withdrawal of the so-called “Cole memo”—named after former Deputy Attorney General James Cole, now a partner at Sidley Austin—sent shock waves through the state-legal cannabis industry. The move, initiated by U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions, added some new level of regulatory uncertainty just as more states were taking steps to legalize marijuana for medical or recreational use.
“If you are considering investing in a company with operations relating to the marijuana business industry, understand that the company may be criminally prosecuted and this may impact the value of your investment,” the SEC said in the alert. The advisory highlighted a portion of a Sessions memorandum that cited “Congress's determination that marijuana is a dangerous drug and that marijuana activity is a serious crime.”
The new alert came as the SEC and federal prosecutors charged Greenview Investment Partners and its founder, Michael E. Cone, with allegedly defrauding investors through false promises of windfalls from investments in marijuana businesses. According to the SEC's complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Cone and the fund raised $3.3 million through a scheme that involved cold calls to retail investors and false claims about having a long record of profitable investing in cannabis-related businesses.
In reality, the SEC alleged, Greenview had no such experience—its sole investment a $400,000 wager on a cannabis company that had yet to harvest a crop. Cone spent investors' money on designer clothes and luxury cars, along with payments to earlier investors meant to prolong his Ponzi-like scheme, the SEC said.
Cone, represented by Bird Marella principal Gary Lincenberg, agreed to be barred from serving as an officer or director at a company, according to the terms of a consent order.
Lincenberg declined to comment Wednesday.
A judge in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas will determine disgorgement and prejudgment interest “at a later time,” the SEC said.
“Greenview allegedly exploited investor interest in the marijuana industry and lied about high returns and the backgrounds of its key executives,” said Shamoil Shipchandler, director of the SEC's regional office in Fort Worth, Texas. “Investors must remain vigilant and not let the fear of missing out dupe them into making bad investment decisions.”
In a parallel criminal case, brought by the U.S. attorney for the Central District of California, prosecutors charged Cone with fraud and seized about $1.4 million in cash and assets.
The complaint is posted below:
Read more:
US Appeals Court Urged to Curb IRS Sway Over Cannabis Industry
Why Patent Lawyers Are Watching This Colorado Cannabis Case
Sonoma Residents Sue Marijuana Farm Over Alleged 'Skunk-like Stench'
➤➤ Get the latest cannabis lawyering, compliance and commentary straight to your inbox with Higher Law, a new Law.com briefing. Learn more and sign up here.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSEC Official Hints at More Restraint With Industry Bars, Less With Wells Meetings
4 minute readSidley Adds Ex-DOJ Criminal Division Deputy Leader, Paul Hastings Adds REIT Partner, in Latest DC Hiring
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 2Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 3Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 4Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
- 5Jackson Lewis Leaders Discuss Firm's Innovation Efforts, From Prompt-a-Thons to Gen AI Pilots
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250